[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gettext 0.11.5-0.1 (i386 all source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:44:12 +0200
Source: gettext
Binary: gettext-doc gettext-base gettext-el gettext
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.11.5-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Changed-By: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Description: 
 gettext    - GNU Internationalization utilities
 gettext-base - GNU Internationalization utilities for the base system
 gettext-doc - Documentation for GNU gettext.
 gettext-el - Emacs po-mode for editing .po files.
Changes: 
 gettext (0.11.5-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Test. Do not consider this official.
Files: 
 eda72ac32e7f82b4143bafca63745494 758 devel optional gettext_0.11.5-0.1.dsc
 bf0360f81cacddb6fc4d38ca26cc2e3d 9614 devel optional gettext_0.11.5-0.1.diff.gz
 da41daff4e51af0f5a51ec71c04aea34 192936 doc optional gettext-doc_0.11.5-0.1_all.deb
 c257ce9e11ba1f869ebe5d33cb9db618 54252 devel optional gettext-el_0.11.5-0.1_all.deb
 cf0bdb2d72e1030a4897ba5bcf206069 402898 base standard gettext-base_0.11.5-0.1_i386.deb
 84861ad4e4cf2762ecc8576eec81d7e6 819542 devel optional gettext_0.11.5-0.1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9WOBCd9Uuvj7yPNYRAlP/AJ9qZC/XNFhsc2gVT/O77RsnO+j57gCfewKa
RMNrLpPjapCiv6lTm8dXZNU=
=M7A3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
gettext-base_0.11.5-0.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gettext/gettext-base_0.11.5-0.1_i386.deb
gettext-doc_0.11.5-0.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gettext/gettext-doc_0.11.5-0.1_all.deb
gettext-el_0.11.5-0.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gettext/gettext-el_0.11.5-0.1_all.deb
gettext_0.11.5-0.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gettext/gettext_0.11.5-0.1.diff.gz
gettext_0.11.5-0.1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gettext/gettext_0.11.5-0.1.dsc
gettext_0.11.5-0.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gettext/gettext_0.11.5-0.1_i386.deb



Reply to: