[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gnustep-back 0.7.8-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 23:07:58 +0200
Source: gnustep-back
Binary: gnustep-back
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GNUstep maintainers <GNUstep-maint@debian.org>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Description: 
 gnustep-back - The GNUstep Backend Library
Closes: 148777
Changes: 
 gnustep-back (0.7.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version.
   * Conflict/Replace with gnustep-xgps (closes: #148777).
Files: 
 a14732c27e0d01b36655d0621ba11278 1004 devel optional gnustep-back_0.7.8-1.dsc
 afb8514e90d27b1da3f2506cf3746f6c 260459 devel optional gnustep-back_0.7.8.orig.tar.gz
 8549f566918a0d63f025d83116ede6b2 5408 devel optional gnustep-back_0.7.8-1.diff.gz
 6a20c936420da3c2daad2906a7ef227c 167520 libs optional gnustep-back_0.7.8-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Requires PGP version 2.6 or later.

iQEVAwUBPTSNWAuDzMCIcnEhAQFcOQf+NTRLqLLfl48YUm4wvEn9UBfViTYAZt17
p3+11mYDxr002yR6EWILPqDzICXzetMu7OrfO0IP1xwuAGT58IBJS4FG3AubQacQ
IAT35eO6bHWrkwIKY6VCNtUYSSs+JtRSPecJqUyTwaguIAp3mf8ZvnKUY3cwpjkp
Tjpat4/knZEkYVtoQx7PZ4oeMPKcVHa/eU9p4BL7ksYQe6ZIv2t4CGeSZOKv4Fuz
eS7nwBhi2vryC6vggrxcUzw5BZAbfCXnVTo+AJ6+APzmEw/K9USugoWLx8Scd71x
DeBqY6yttgkFgtI2GZSyhl6NstduUKogWHqVDxjFYJscCIleDw07+Q==
=edPE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
gnustep-back_0.7.8-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnustep-back/gnustep-back_0.7.8-1.diff.gz
gnustep-back_0.7.8-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnustep-back/gnustep-back_0.7.8-1.dsc
gnustep-back_0.7.8-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnustep-back/gnustep-back_0.7.8-1_i386.deb
gnustep-back_0.7.8.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnustep-back/gnustep-back_0.7.8.orig.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: