Accepted blt 2.4y-1 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 17:02:07 +0100
Source: blt
Binary: blt8.0-dev blt-dev blt-common blt-demo blt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4y-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gordon Russell <gor@debian.org>
Changed-By: Gordon Russell <gor@debian.org>
Description:
blt - Shared libraries for blt
blt-common - Common run-time parts to the BLT libraries
blt-demo - blt demo scripts - a tcl/tk extension library
blt-dev - Development in blt - a tcl/tk extension library
blt8.0-dev - Development in blt and tk8.0 - a tcl/tk extension library
Closes: 112351 133569 143349 150425
Changes:
blt (2.4y-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version.
o I do not actually use blt, but I used to and my rather small testset
seems to work on this package. Happy to receive testing feedback.
o stubs still not supported upstream
o dynamic libraries do not have the full dependencies (fixed). Hope I
understood shared library dependencies correctly and it is the upstream
maintainer who is wrong rather than me!
o still use DEBIAN code to support different tcl/tk combinations of
run-time conditions.
o still some lintian problems initially with rpath and executables
(fixed in package).
o lintian complains that the shlib control file has duplicate
entries, even though the major numbers are different. For simplicity
I only show the 8.3 linkages to make lintian happy, but this is
probably the wrong solution, and is probably a lintian error. But
to be honest I never understood shlib control function so I do not
know if I am right or not. If you are having problems with this part
of blt let me know.
(closes: #150425)
* Move the doc-base entries to Apps/Programming, as per the
advice of Ben Burton <benb@acm.org>
(closes: #112351)
* Fails to build on the HURD.
Somehow I never noticed this email until now, so sorry for the delay
Anyway, the patch is now added - hope this works out for all the HURD
users.
(closes: #143349)
* A problem with vectors was reported as a bug. Happily this problem does
not occur with this latest version of BLT.
(closes: #133569)
Files:
28ba7efa5a8d471773819deea67912c3 680 devel extra blt_2.4y-1.dsc
3c7ca89d3301dce5efab085122415b74 2088257 devel extra blt_2.4y.orig.tar.gz
a1d9af98dc611e7e9407b4fe1678ac16 134687 devel extra blt_2.4y-1.diff.gz
4aede9c9c2dd3ea69c8e88660c5ddcdf 1421234 libs extra blt_2.4y-1_i386.deb
0105baae595cd192a7e5a4bf2e563de3 29918 libs extra blt-common_2.4y-1_i386.deb
6692f207b4fee613d180f4d4db8b1501 1088180 devel extra blt-dev_2.4y-1_i386.deb
ef93175e4e9ee89376a8a9f17b00ea3e 594628 devel extra blt-demo_2.4y-1_i386.deb
2f1f6a5c869ac85dcf1882e34a9d0c93 1086054 devel extra blt8.0-dev_2.4y-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj0WMmcACgkQsbjrHwXvAePnmgCeLD2oNRwZ9t/8xgcOKakwyqkW
BnMAoIi59uIHwqmvmJnCDiDT3MBL8K3u
=dFQl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
blt-common_2.4y-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/blt/blt-common_2.4y-1_i386.deb
blt-demo_2.4y-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/blt/blt-demo_2.4y-1_i386.deb
blt-dev_2.4y-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/blt/blt-dev_2.4y-1_i386.deb
blt8.0-dev_2.4y-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/blt/blt8.0-dev_2.4y-1_i386.deb
blt_2.4y-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/b/blt/blt_2.4y-1.diff.gz
blt_2.4y-1.dsc
to pool/main/b/blt/blt_2.4y-1.dsc
blt_2.4y-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/blt/blt_2.4y-1_i386.deb
blt_2.4y.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/blt/blt_2.4y.orig.tar.gz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: