Accepted bastille 1:1.3.0-4 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 09:52:12 +0200
Source: bastille
Binary: bastille
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.3.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>
Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>
Description:
bastille - Security hardening tool
Changes:
bastille (1:1.3.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Added /var/lock/subsys to debian/dirs so that the firewall
runs nicely.
* Fixed an unreported bug in INCs that prevented it from finding
Bastille_Tk.pm (due to it being moved in 1.3.0-3)
* Edited the psad installation to work non-interactively
(install.debian.pl)
* Removed psad from debian/rules so that it is not activated by Bastille.
This software is not ready for release in Debian
since installation should be done in a separate package
(sorry guys, you will need
to take the source package to make it work)
* Edited InstallBastille to remove DB from the LINUX alias in
order to *not* ask about Psad (in Questions.txt it is linked to LINUX)
Files:
a47d9b0727bcf43c3b1f4451deb0347b 700 admin optional bastille_1.3.0-4.dsc
21d73ef9d0457fb22e7b30b4ff4d54c9 23493 admin optional bastille_1.3.0-4.diff.gz
42e0814b2407098893e94b4d9fa7aa60 236946 admin optional bastille_1.3.0-4_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBPONw6/tEPvakNq0lAQEqHQP9GsDo4Ca80SFzH0xrhn5az7aN6156L+Wm
xpw1odsW4kLbX1prfrV79q/CqOzOWRzaBmR5xzMQ/azvji4mE9aUoDBxd5nWbYc1
dz8ngb05zEh0UvLKkTI0occINZaT/7setxAsIfVIwMjsurV1mPIMdS7FMXt9rK04
3NqTyU40/dk=
=8BEC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
bastille_1.3.0-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/b/bastille/bastille_1.3.0-4.diff.gz
bastille_1.3.0-4.dsc
to pool/main/b/bastille/bastille_1.3.0-4.dsc
bastille_1.3.0-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/bastille/bastille_1.3.0-4_i386.deb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: