[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gs-aladdin 7.04-2 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 23:08:53 +0200
Source: gs-aladdin
Binary: gs-aladdin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 7.04-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff <torsten@debian.org>
Changed-By: Torsten Landschoff <torsten@debian.org>
Description: 
 gs-aladdin - The Ghostscript Postscript interpreter
Closes: 95198 128564 128790 142802
Changes: 
 gs-aladdin (7.04-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Reimplement libpaper support (closes: #128790).
   * Like in gs prefer the x11 driver over x11alpha again as the latter
     has some problems with b&w displays.
   * debian/postinst: Manage the gs-aladdin manpage as a slave to the
     gs alternative (see gs: #122538).
   * debian/rules: Remove dvipdf from the resulting package and all
     the manpages as they are in gs-common already (closes: #142802).
   * debian/devices:
     + Include the ijs driver (closes: #128564).
     + Add the pcl3 driver (closes: #95198).
Files: 
 e069c65c7dacc7f0a8035338fc654889 698 non-free/text optional gs-aladdin_7.04-2.dsc
 a7e3de9e24e18da13dd71e5ad29971f0 1814062 non-free/text optional gs-aladdin_7.04-2.diff.gz
 d42577238b202669fc34c1730fabb25f 2379446 non-free/text optional gs-aladdin_7.04-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8xy4odQgHtVUb5EcRAo1BAJ40E7tMgTOr9WgORkzTIlqPgprzOACcC80r
hWQh6MSy393HyMkTvXuB+yQ=
=CFeK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
gs-aladdin_7.04-2.diff.gz
  to pool/non-free/g/gs-aladdin/gs-aladdin_7.04-2.diff.gz
gs-aladdin_7.04-2.dsc
  to pool/non-free/g/gs-aladdin/gs-aladdin_7.04-2.dsc
gs-aladdin_7.04-2_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/g/gs-aladdin/gs-aladdin_7.04-2_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: