Accepted fetchmail 5.9.11-4 (i386 source all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:54:47 -0300
Source: fetchmail
Binary: fetchmailconf fetchmail fetchmail-common
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 5.9.11-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
Changed-By: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
Description:
fetchmail - POP3, APOP, IMAP mail gatherer/forwarder (crypto-crippled binary)
fetchmail-common - POP3, APOP, IMAP mail gatherer/forwarder (common files)
fetchmailconf - fetchmail configurator
Changes:
fetchmail (5.9.11-4) unstable; urgency=high
.
* The "I knew it" release
* Hack around STLS problems: fetchmail would try to start STLS even if
it was already talking over a secured channel. Thanks to Matt Kraai
<kraai@alumni.cmu.edu> for the patch
Files:
735c228e882a8d44fd19bba81b712712 759 mail optional fetchmail_5.9.11-4.dsc
e61bb2c83e636594cd70b533dece8efa 296858 mail optional fetchmail_5.9.11-4.diff.gz
1ecd65294cfd5c86c8bf5e5ffc07a7a0 164936 mail optional fetchmail-common_5.9.11-4_all.deb
982fa3a9f142e17eadaa8784a1fd9043 92182 mail optional fetchmailconf_5.9.11-4_all.deb
768ab91bb2cd1794f01ae8996e441cb2 286334 mail optional fetchmail_5.9.11-4_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjzGxAoACgkQ7iXePxzbD+PIwACgivA587yb6lRn2zeYUXgBPs/2
jzYAnjjKxWwqlfwnQLcOW9BIDR6UgYgv
=9rhe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
fetchmail-common_5.9.11-4_all.deb
to pool/main/f/fetchmail/fetchmail-common_5.9.11-4_all.deb
fetchmail_5.9.11-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/f/fetchmail/fetchmail_5.9.11-4.diff.gz
fetchmail_5.9.11-4.dsc
to pool/main/f/fetchmail/fetchmail_5.9.11-4.dsc
fetchmail_5.9.11-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/f/fetchmail/fetchmail_5.9.11-4_i386.deb
fetchmailconf_5.9.11-4_all.deb
to pool/main/f/fetchmail/fetchmailconf_5.9.11-4_all.deb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: