[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted bsmtpd 2.3pl8b-12 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 16:18:23 +0200
Source: bsmtpd
Binary: bsmtpd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3pl8b-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Roland Rosenfeld <roland@debian.org>
Changed-By: Roland Rosenfeld <roland@debian.org>
Description: 
 bsmtpd     - Batched SMTP mailer for sendmail and postfix
Closes: 136251 137283 137285 143743
Changes: 
 bsmtpd (2.3pl8b-12) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Quote -p option in sendmail call to avoid problems with a remotehost
     name like '(null)' (Closes: #137285).
   * Change contact address from fifi@rz.uni-hildesheim.de to
     roland@debian.org, since Axel no longer maintaining the package
     upstream.
   * Remove stale lock files now (Closes: #137283, #136251).
   * Move bsmtp.m4 to /usr/share/sendmail/cf/mailer/bsmtp.m4 and add a
     symlink to /usr/share/sendmail/sendmail.cf/mailer/bsmtp.m4, because
     sendmail >=8.12.3-1 need this directory moved, while I still need
     backward compatibility in bsmtpd until the new sendmail is in woody
     (Closes: #143743).
Files: 
 b60ee39c93fae1ce4c6efbcd1f059f17 568 mail extra bsmtpd_2.3pl8b-12.dsc
 5777c0456a30f62e9d1fc34ce747247c 16534 mail extra bsmtpd_2.3pl8b-12.diff.gz
 4336581ed0c91a31e9e8a30c15ffb4dd 30118 mail extra bsmtpd_2.3pl8b-12_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE8wX36O7/Pd72LBQ0RAsQYAJ9sZ+e6bFfBzSUMzkOQN/iyhsBuwACfcNKy
murME4w072DFuZFQfwPVFV8=
=zTDN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
bsmtpd_2.3pl8b-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/bsmtpd/bsmtpd_2.3pl8b-12.diff.gz
bsmtpd_2.3pl8b-12.dsc
  to pool/main/b/bsmtpd/bsmtpd_2.3pl8b-12.dsc
bsmtpd_2.3pl8b-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/bsmtpd/bsmtpd_2.3pl8b-12_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: