[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted libreadline-java 0.7.0-2 (i386 all source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 20:17:45 +1000
Source: libreadline-java
Binary: libreadline-java-doc libreadline-java
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.7.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Ben Burton <benb@acm.org>
Changed-By: Ben Burton <benb@acm.org>
Description: 
 libreadline-java - GNU readline and BSD editline wrappers for Java
 libreadline-java-doc - API docs for readline/editline wrappers for Java
Changes: 
 libreadline-java (0.7.0-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Updated build procedure to reflect relocation of kaffe bootstrap classes.
     Now either location should be fine.
   * Modified build-depends to ensure we're not building under a broken jikes.
Files: 
 67afbffa2eb3f0199f86df5ac75eedee 757 libs optional libreadline-java_0.7.0-2.dsc
 3f1b99150aea29c7d19090251560ade5 19137 libs optional libreadline-java_0.7.0-2.diff.gz
 717e6eeddc9472e5af862f7cbb18a527 20512 doc optional libreadline-java-doc_0.7.0-2_all.deb
 7105e5c689f93eb38e3bc6b6ccc20190 19296 libs optional libreadline-java_0.7.0-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8v/JTMQNuxza4YcERArSTAJ4pgaRvbNl+OPvUoZGU68WwE5PMcgCfR4V/
trsdANdwZub5G5Ze0uP/MBQ=
=/1rL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libreadline-java-doc_0.7.0-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/libr/libreadline-java/libreadline-java-doc_0.7.0-2_all.deb
libreadline-java_0.7.0-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libr/libreadline-java/libreadline-java_0.7.0-2.diff.gz
libreadline-java_0.7.0-2.dsc
  to pool/main/libr/libreadline-java/libreadline-java_0.7.0-2.dsc
libreadline-java_0.7.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libr/libreadline-java/libreadline-java_0.7.0-2_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: