Accepted procman 1.0-1 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:36:53 -0500
Source: procman
Binary: procman
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>
Changed-By: James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>
Description:
procman - Gnome process viewer
Changes:
procman (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream.
Files:
22c8a9ebf4e6c5e491eb4f1acc945f09 1421 admin optional procman_1.0-1.dsc
832863132b8fc899fc2a2906775452a8 443239 admin optional procman_1.0.orig.tar.gz
ceaad120d4b760190788782e7c490b84 2259 admin optional procman_1.0-1.diff.gz
fe95e98ce61fe4f01a8d2159a0a9952e 224292 admin optional procman_1.0-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org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=Z33d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
procman_1.0-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/procman/procman_1.0-1.diff.gz
procman_1.0-1.dsc
to pool/main/p/procman/procman_1.0-1.dsc
procman_1.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/procman/procman_1.0-1_i386.deb
procman_1.0.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/procman/procman_1.0.orig.tar.gz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: