[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted zope-pythonmethod 0.1.7-4 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 19:29:15 +0000
Source: zope-pythonmethod
Binary: zope-pythonmethod zope-bytecodehacks
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.7-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Description: 
 zope-bytecodehacks - Rewrite bytecode of functions to do unlikely things in Python
 zope-pythonmethod - Allows ZopeMethods to be written in plain Python code
Closes: 76051 78965 118969
Changes: 
 zope-pythonmethod (0.1.7-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Add versioned python dependencies, which appear to be why the zope
     maintainer wanted to conflict with old versions of zope product packages
     (closes: #118969).
   * Import Products.zbytecodehacks.VSExec, not zbytecodehacks.VSExec
     (closes: #76051, #78965).
Files: 
 5779ed4ff9031fd3945a7ae97a109f78 656 web extra zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4.dsc
 b91d255360781210bcd66a5e046773a6 4041 web extra zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4.diff.gz
 d0ee35c12f9aa3f6a55e90666e720729 11828 web extra zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4_i386.deb
 945144dc26f8fd69e990fe17383c3409 100104 web extra zope-bytecodehacks_0.1.7-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> -- Debian developer

iD8DBQE8klB19t0zAhD6TNERAk4fAJ4vIS4zh4/u5OfTUM+uQNUQqeYyKQCbBmF/
iHSPzaHyr4M5FM7xko7piUY=
=jAeX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
zope-bytecodehacks_0.1.7-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/z/zope-pythonmethod/zope-bytecodehacks_0.1.7-4_i386.deb
zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/z/zope-pythonmethod/zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4.diff.gz
zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4.dsc
  to pool/main/z/zope-pythonmethod/zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4.dsc
zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/z/zope-pythonmethod/zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4_i386.deb



Reply to: