[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted lmbench 2.0-patch2-2 (i386 all source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:39:16 +0100
Source: lmbench
Binary: lmbench-doc lmbench
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.0-patch2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>
Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>
Description: 
 lmbench    - Utilities to benchmark UNIX systems
 lmbench-doc - Documentation for the lmbench benchmark suite
Closes: 137919
Changes: 
 lmbench (2.0-patch2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Added CONFIGDIR and make it point to /var/lib/lmbench/config
   * Configuration now saved in $CONFIGDIR (Closes: #137919)
   * Results now saved in $RESULTSDIR under /var/...
   * Changed --purge so it removes the created files under /var/...
   * Created a RUNDIR so that compilation (gnu-os script) is done
   there just in case any cruft (tempfiles) are left there.
Files: 
 4697afdbe66014456fd71a106a7e5511 728 admin optional lmbench_2.0-patch2-2.dsc
 fec588375ef336f6a6925302099da867 9281 admin optional lmbench_2.0-patch2-2.diff.gz
 8e3e108c900c049075494fe4099e85bb 67196 admin optional lmbench-doc_2.0-patch2-2_all.deb
 e54403cc6d99b07d8fe6a34a1588023f 311936 admin optional lmbench_2.0-patch2-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBPI9dx/tEPvakNq0lAQG6+wP/S7/d3sMH233/T2BkiJ6BazY/7YzyebbN
ZAGbBIFmLUDfQAmIG5y32Bl4RYkg4oxD8Ea12xcRgMFoEy0Tl9imVK8yO8A5zAY7
Vx+ar/CsVUafsEQB7u+LRe2yeU9Oj1q+xvwkP/LA+jAGynA2FW1I2DGkvl+LsQkD
SJAvUbGGPGU=
=cOLd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
lmbench-doc_2.0-patch2-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/lmbench/lmbench-doc_2.0-patch2-2_all.deb
lmbench_2.0-patch2-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/lmbench/lmbench_2.0-patch2-2.diff.gz
lmbench_2.0-patch2-2.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lmbench/lmbench_2.0-patch2-2.dsc
lmbench_2.0-patch2-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lmbench/lmbench_2.0-patch2-2_i386.deb



Reply to: