Installed nessus-core 1.0.10-1 (i386 source all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:46:40 +0100
Source: nessus-core
Binary: nessus-dev nessusd nessus
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.0.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin <jrodin@jagor.srce.hr>
Changed-By: Josip Rodin <jrodin@jagor.srce.hr>
Description:
nessus - Remote network security auditor, the client
nessus-dev - Nessus development header files
nessusd - Remote network security auditor, the server
Closes: 113970 130747
Changes:
nessus-core (1.0.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version, closes: #130747.
* Fixed the interference in the description :) closes: #113970.
* Marked /etc/logrotate.d/nessusd as a conffile.
Files:
032456f86a6b960ba705025551e078d3 771 non-US optional nessus-core_1.0.10-1.dsc
6585a1e39ff62ced75b35da441c38316 551850 non-US optional nessus-core_1.0.10.orig.tar.gz
1ca99124c999c78509d7d6f82ccfb37b 7950 non-US optional nessus-core_1.0.10-1.diff.gz
c54823af815d54e5c93edc83b0f1a10b 19960 non-US optional nessus-dev_1.0.10-1_all.deb
ddac183dcb6e8aa914ad09b7cf8767ea 282500 non-US optional nessus_1.0.10-1_i386.deb
03faee3224b4877638aa4f49b3213dad 69482 non-US optional nessusd_1.0.10-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8WYjDC1RHoiANFZYRAn6KAJ9dXDO4MFDc8s1FUUwu29VC6bvIrACgrECL
gVuzR9OdPflicq3tvMnmD6E=
=V04Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Installed:
nessus-core_1.0.10-1.diff.gz
to pool/non-US/main/n/nessus-core/nessus-core_1.0.10-1.diff.gz
nessus-core_1.0.10-1.dsc
to pool/non-US/main/n/nessus-core/nessus-core_1.0.10-1.dsc
nessus-core_1.0.10.orig.tar.gz
to pool/non-US/main/n/nessus-core/nessus-core_1.0.10.orig.tar.gz
nessus-dev_1.0.10-1_all.deb
to pool/non-US/main/n/nessus-core/nessus-dev_1.0.10-1_all.deb
nessus_1.0.10-1_i386.deb
to pool/non-US/main/n/nessus-core/nessus_1.0.10-1_i386.deb
nessusd_1.0.10-1_i386.deb
to pool/non-US/main/n/nessus-core/nessusd_1.0.10-1_i386.deb
Reply to: