[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed sdl-image1.2 1.2.1-1.1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 05:45:38 -0500
Source: sdl-image1.2
Binary: libsdl-image1.2 libsdl-image1.2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.1-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian T. Steigies <cts@debian.org>
Changed-By: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
Description: 
 libsdl-image1.2 - image loading library for Simple DirectMedia Layer 1.2
 libsdl-image1.2-dev - development files for SDL 1.2 image loading libray
Changes: 
 sdl-image1.2 (1.2.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * NMU
   * built against libsdl1.2 1.2.2-3.3
   * acinclude.m4: removed copy of sdl.m4
   * configure.in: IMG_LIBS should use SDL_LIBS_FOR_LIBS, not SDL_LIBS
   * re-ran libtoolize --force --copy; aclocal; automake --foreign; autoconf
   * debian/control:
     - updated Build-Depends and Depends on libsdl1.2 to 1.2.2-3.3
     - tweaked package descriptions
Files: 
 169780073ac260e1c247a8e9973c57bf 740 libs optional sdl-image1.2_1.2.1-1.1.dsc
 0abc6ccecd450c4e40e52199277e42df 49765 libs optional sdl-image1.2_1.2.1-1.1.diff.gz
 d7b3418f1327329b5e20351aad50f648 18018 libs optional libsdl-image1.2_1.2.1-1.1_i386.deb
 71d739d6e7e236d803e42b67e0847f73 23274 devel optional libsdl-image1.2-dev_1.2.1-1.1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjwskmAACgkQ6kxmHytGonwa7gCgo7irdJkflGasl+SZsQudBXIL
CGsAnjN/3rkTTdNoPs+uYXZhXlCM4Qjj
=4mNi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Installed:
libsdl-image1.2-dev_1.2.1-1.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sdl-image1.2/libsdl-image1.2-dev_1.2.1-1.1_i386.deb
libsdl-image1.2_1.2.1-1.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sdl-image1.2/libsdl-image1.2_1.2.1-1.1_i386.deb
sdl-image1.2_1.2.1-1.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sdl-image1.2/sdl-image1.2_1.2.1-1.1.diff.gz
sdl-image1.2_1.2.1-1.1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sdl-image1.2/sdl-image1.2_1.2.1-1.1.dsc



Reply to: