Re: Uploaded sbuild 0.2.1 (source all) to ftp-master
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 01:10:55PM -0800, Rick Younie wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:05:14AM -0800, Rick Younie wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Format: 1.7
> > > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 06:53:24 -0800
> > > Source: sbuild
> > > Binary: sbuild
> > > Architecture: source all
> > > Version: 0.2.1
> > > Distribution: unstable
> > > Urgency: low
> > > Maintainer: Rick Younie <younie@debian.org>
> > > Changed-By: Rick Younie <younie@debian.org>
> > > Description:
> > > sbuild - Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources
> > > Changes:
> > > sbuild (0.2.1) unstable; urgency=low
> > > .
> > > * dpkg-buildpackage craps out on the unknown -d switch in the
> > > stable chroot.
> >
> > Well that explains the bug, but not how you fixed it. So did you just
> > remove that switch? maybe you could use "dpkg --version" to decide when
> > to use this (it is absolutely essential for buildd's)
>
> It was a bug I introduced and the package hasn't seen its initial
> install yet, was why not much detail. sbuild in CVS doesn't use
> "dpkg-buildpackage -d" AFAICT.
>
> I added it because it allows the user to play with dependencies
> (maybe manually installing something) w/o sbuild crapping out
> because dpkg-buildpackage is unhappy with missing build-deps.
> But the stable dpkg-buildpackage barfs when it sees the switch.
> I'll add your version check after it's installed and otherwise
> seems to be working ok.
>
> BTW, sbuild is patched a little to allow it to use source in the
> current directory. If you have time I'd appreciate it if you
> could have a look. It could no doubt be improved.
Does your version of sbuild use apt-get like the buildd's use? I'm sure
that apt would recognize the source already being available in the cwd.
--
.----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=-----.
/ Ben Collins -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: