Installed docbook-dsssl 1.73-3 (all source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 23:13:06 -0500
Source: docbook-dsssl
Binary: docbook-dsssl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.73-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>
Changed-By: Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>
Description:
docbook-dsssl - Modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets, for print and HTML
Changes:
docbook-dsssl (1.73-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* include html and print changelogs (rather than just having an empty
dir); get rid of empty <doc>/test subdir
* provide catalog entries for the i18n text entries; this makes it
easier to override procedures in dbl1XX.dsl
* fix the compatibility symlink at
/usr/lib/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/docbook/nwalsh to the real location
(but I notice due to a bug in dpkg, if you have a dir there, you
probably have to remove and reinstall the package)
* building requires new sgml-data 1.5.4 or better, we use a new arg to
sgml-catalog-check.pl; fix a problem in the invocation of that which
was causing the compatibility symlinks to be created in the wrong
place
* policy checked against 3.5.6
* update freebsd.dsl to 1.59
Files:
d641bfe0f45882236ee198798c0e0899 794 text optional docbook-dsssl_1.73-3.dsc
ec20eb7c13ec668010056020462697d0 18786 text optional docbook-dsssl_1.73-3.diff.gz
cbed2170814b183537c3bd271d1385ef 316696 text optional docbook-dsssl_1.73-3_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iQCVAwUBO/ncUo/8QF79WmfNAQHt6wP9FjZQ73LeSBJfEwXnomD716x9Mk7wkscx
5aZiZ0wH3P67TK164ovRLTdteIsZedy5Z3oE3Q23E3y1g8vD6IGZutjIzYUWNrAJ
crU8CFdfYXYnf0dKgNt0pkFF5jBHFG7Q6O2Uy04TF0RuCAcQqPrQYARy75CSrePn
wG547ioz4Kw=
=YyNj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Installed:
docbook-dsssl_1.73-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/docbook-dsssl/docbook-dsssl_1.73-3.diff.gz
docbook-dsssl_1.73-3.dsc
to pool/main/d/docbook-dsssl/docbook-dsssl_1.73-3.dsc
docbook-dsssl_1.73-3_all.deb
to pool/main/d/docbook-dsssl/docbook-dsssl_1.73-3_all.deb
Reply to: