[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed roxen 1.3.122-23 (i386 all source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:40:41 +0100
Source: roxen
Binary: roxen-ssl roxen-doc roxen
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.3.122-23
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@debian.org>
Changed-By: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@debian.org>
Description: 
 roxen      - The Roxen Challenger Webserver
 roxen-doc  - The Roxen Challenger Webserver HTML documents
 roxen-ssl  - SSL3 modules for the Roxen Challenger Webserver
Changes: 
 roxen (1.3.122-23) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Only uploading to unstable. 'only security and/or critical bug
     fixes go into stable'...
   * Out of date std version
   * dh_testversion is deprecated.
   * Debian changelog file contains user emacs settings
   * s/db_input/db_get/g
   * Purge debconf in postrm
   # Use dh_strip instead of strip...
Files: 
 7d0f51926551fc2a0846600b0b4bfcc1 696 web optional roxen_1.3.122-23.dsc
 5c3a4bec4252cabbe080d57991e52590 81575 web optional roxen_1.3.122-23.diff.gz
 cc673a88ef54a6c3fc221a11f5561867 37666 contrib/web optional roxen-ssl_1.3.122-23_all.deb
 f509692f5b96802bcea88c4a0f7695f7 2941776 doc optional roxen-doc_1.3.122-23_all.deb
 570ee429a5142255a0b7bcd88fbe2fbe 1428634 web optional roxen_1.3.122-23_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjv0GoMACgkQmlWzPKccHgBGtQCeOGPmK7vdR093d7jaqV2lgyuF
zRcAn0B1GOsTV3Sd9Bdx7eQXiNxayXF/
=1lFC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Installed:
roxen-doc_1.3.122-23_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/roxen/roxen-doc_1.3.122-23_all.deb
roxen_1.3.122-23.dsc
  to pool/main/r/roxen/roxen_1.3.122-23.dsc
roxen_1.3.122-23_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/roxen/roxen_1.3.122-23_i386.deb
roxen_1.3.122-23.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/roxen/roxen_1.3.122-23.diff.gz
roxen-ssl_1.3.122-23_all.deb
  to pool/contrib/r/roxen/roxen-ssl_1.3.122-23_all.deb



Reply to: