[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed gnome-pim 1.4.3-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 02:46:40 +0200
Source: gnome-pim
Binary: gnome-pim gnome-pim-conduits
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastian Rittau <srittau@debian.org>
Changed-By: Sebastian Rittau <srittau@debian.org>
Description: 
 gnome-pim  - Calendar and address book for GNOME.
 gnome-pim-conduits - Palm synchronization for calendar and address book.
Changes: 
 gnome-pim (1.4.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version.
   * This version works with gnome-pilot 0.1.62. Thanks a lot to Mike Marley
     for his hard work with gnome-pilot and gnome-pim.
   * Removed some files from gnome-pim-conduits.files which aren't built
     anymore.
   * Build-Depend on libgnome-pilot1-dev instead of libgnome-pilot0-dev.
Files: 
 7539316ef62bf5b8c4b9e88c1c47039f 888 utils - gnome-pim_1.4.3-1.dsc
 71e1cf0114de88c688c4865c141c742a 1270786 utils - gnome-pim_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz
 6ba34a7bf517d107a6ed626399799899 233183 utils - gnome-pim_1.4.3-1.diff.gz
 a84790aa6ea5c4067a57354d42e8eb35 540100 utils optional gnome-pim_1.4.3-1_i386.deb
 33ae3d4ba3b9c15d484ff9e586cd0ac3 184032 utils extra gnome-pim-conduits_1.4.3-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Weitere Infos: siehe http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjvI6YIACgkQcU5mtElqGCeKnwCgkbzetq367KwGQA4FV4cAS3z7
IMwAn2W62mRjYyzj0BGuUjh5RhOo4yIH
=0yLb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Installed:
gnome-pim_1.4.3-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnome-pim/gnome-pim_1.4.3-1.diff.gz
gnome-pim_1.4.3-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnome-pim/gnome-pim_1.4.3-1.dsc
gnome-pim_1.4.3-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-pim/gnome-pim_1.4.3-1_i386.deb
gnome-pim-conduits_1.4.3-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-pim/gnome-pim-conduits_1.4.3-1_i386.deb
gnome-pim_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnome-pim/gnome-pim_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: