[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed libtabe 0.1.9-5 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 21:10:13 +1000
Source: libtabe
Binary: libtabe0 libtabe0-dev libtabe-db
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.9-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roger So <rogerso@debian.org>
Changed-By: Roger So <rogerso@debian.org>
Description: 
 libtabe-db - Data of Chinese lexicons in Big5 encoding
 libtabe0   - C library for Chinese lexicons related functions
 libtabe0-dev - C development library for Chinese lexicons related functions
Closes: 108833
Changes: 
 libtabe (0.1.9-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed src/tsi-src/Makefile.in -- builds using fakeroot should work
     now. (Closes: #108833)
   * Got rid of lintian warnings, however there are lintian errors still
     due to the lack of manpages for the binaries. I'll try to write
     them when I get the time to. :)
Files: 
 45ec2f67e5557f03695ec68f415b5bbf 687 libs optional libtabe_0.1.9-5.dsc
 3dc97d047d555ab7ffca330f618067dc 30582 libs optional libtabe_0.1.9-5.diff.gz
 5d76e2407b5fdd1c915b38364f0aab00 5100098 text optional libtabe-db_0.1.9-5_i386.deb
 f57884b05321b8aa127aac579104138c 175272 libs optional libtabe0_0.1.9-5_i386.deb
 607450dd1356c7cc75d7aaaeafedc48f 282964 devel optional libtabe0-dev_0.1.9-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7fP9oDlk3rJj6oK0RAtF7AJ9/43KWemyix+Sr96n8IY6NFa0B5QCcD/Ld
jVwFvkAeStVyfizz7f5ALBU=
=lxWk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Installed:
libtabe_0.1.9-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libt/libtabe/libtabe_0.1.9-5.diff.gz
libtabe-db_0.1.9-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtabe/libtabe-db_0.1.9-5_i386.deb
libtabe0-dev_0.1.9-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtabe/libtabe0-dev_0.1.9-5_i386.deb
libtabe_0.1.9-5.dsc
  to pool/main/libt/libtabe/libtabe_0.1.9-5.dsc
libtabe0_0.1.9-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtabe/libtabe0_0.1.9-5_i386.deb



Reply to: