[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed distributed-net 2.8012.2-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 17:59:26 -0500
Source: distributed-net
Binary: distributed-net
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.8012.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joe Drew <drew@debian.org>
Changed-By: Joe Drew <drew@debian.org>
Description: 
 distributed-net - donate unused CPU cycles - client for distributed.net
Closes: 90796
Changes: 
 distributed-net (2.8012.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Downgraded clients to ones that distributed-net officially blesses in
     light of bugs they've released (Closes: Bug#90796)
     Note that I've requested the version in proposed-updates be removed;
     unfortunately distributed-net users will have to wait until woody is
     released to get the new version in a stable format.
   * Added more lintian overrides
Files: 
 37fef3092ad8a2e08b1c4ef74e4b00e1 669 non-free/misc optional distributed-net_2.8012.2-1.dsc
 3044c79a485326e2c4835515510475e6 1692620 non-free/misc optional distributed-net_2.8012.2.orig.tar.gz
 4b756f49fa6f28e2a780d9e8a8ab2290 11244 non-free/misc optional distributed-net_2.8012.2-1.diff.gz
 9f252e5f341c1eed3e7d32944e4f1672 276758 non-free/misc optional distributed-net_2.8012.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6vnslo7ginaV9i/cRAnTfAJ91Lk2w/Ur5SEPu9G6r8/BkJCIreQCgh+dy
QCFDj34HEtzVSEGEQ8I7iqg=
=mcYV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Installed:
distributed-net_2.8012.2-1.dsc
  to pool/non-free/d/distributed-net/distributed-net_2.8012.2-1.dsc
distributed-net_2.8012.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/non-free/d/distributed-net/distributed-net_2.8012.2.orig.tar.gz
distributed-net_2.8012.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/non-free/d/distributed-net/distributed-net_2.8012.2-1.diff.gz
distributed-net_2.8012.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/d/distributed-net/distributed-net_2.8012.2-1_i386.deb



Reply to: