[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed gnome-guile 1:0.19-pre0.20-2 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  9 Mar 2001 11:06:53 -0500
Source: gnome-guile
Binary: libguilegnome-dev libguilegnome0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:0.19-pre0.20-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>
Changed-By: James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>
Description: 
 libguilegnome-dev - Dev libraries for gnome-guile scheme interpreter (part of Gnome)
 libguilegnome0 - Libraries for gnome-guile scheme interpreter (part of Gnome)
Changes: 
 gnome-guile (1:0.19-pre0.20-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * fix gnome-guile/gtkhtml/gtkhtml-glue.c where the sizeof was declared
     in a string.  This messes with alpha builds.  Strangely I can't figure
     out why build-guile-gtk is doing it. Should fix #89027.  I'll close
     after I hear that it does.
   * Up standards version to 3.1.0.
Files: 
 f6bf4df8cc9037a9cdd3b805528ada64 1100 devel optional gnome-guile_0.19-pre0.20-2.dsc
 c98511069aea86489a1e5fcac85e16ec 42030 devel optional gnome-guile_0.19-pre0.20-2.diff.gz
 1b3e48d337e6d803379cc07acb57fecb 133982 devel optional libguilegnome0_0.19-pre0.20-2_i386.deb
 0db19323782e4de91e0776bffe6c154d 144982 devel optional libguilegnome-dev_0.19-pre0.20-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjqpDPkACgkQAE97gVR4K5rhqACcD4jvRnaktdEOPR6DvXQeN2w3
SSIAn2mvITR1Ty+biEIL/1Hj6zyiJHVl
=ssVf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Installed:
gnome-guile_0.19-pre0.20-2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnome-guile/gnome-guile_0.19-pre0.20-2.dsc
libguilegnome-dev_0.19-pre0.20-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-guile/libguilegnome-dev_0.19-pre0.20-2_i386.deb
gnome-guile_0.19-pre0.20-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnome-guile/gnome-guile_0.19-pre0.20-2.diff.gz
libguilegnome0_0.19-pre0.20-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-guile/libguilegnome0_0.19-pre0.20-2_i386.deb



Reply to: