Installed asclock 2.0.12-2 (i386 all source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:14:39 +0100
Source: asclock
Binary: asclock-themes asclock
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.0.12-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marcelo E. Magallon <mmagallo@debian.org>
Changed-By: Marcelo E. Magallon <mmagallo@debian.org>
Description:
asclock - A clock designed with the NeXTStep look
asclock-themes - Theme files for ASclock, a clock applet
Closes: 86960
Changes:
asclock (2.0.12-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Hmmm... changed build-dependencies to xlibs-dev (I'm still waiting
for the technical reason that says this change was a Good Thing,
instead of the childish "I don't like the name" argument) (closes:
bug#86960)
* While I'm at this... upgraded Standards-Version to 3.5
* Moved to debhelper 3
* Moved binary to /usr/bin (what? You used a hardcoded path? Sorry, not my
problem)
* debian/asclock.menu: see above
* debian/rules: the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS thing
* ROTFL! asclock.man: s/0.99/1/ (this is not the program's version, it the
manpage section!
* debian/rules: removed silly 'cp asclock.man asclock.1x' (joeyh rules!)
Files:
e6aebac3eaaa486ba44d13bff48618a7 646 x11 optional asclock_2.0.12-2.dsc
ba689d92d86ef8e35cad2d193f6d2c66 5615 x11 optional asclock_2.0.12-2.diff.gz
92e611c7a7e02fa4191debec5f94f537 78364 x11 optional asclock-themes_2.0.12-2_all.deb
a953b875f2105d1494d54d7048f89fec 23436 x11 optional asclock_2.0.12-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjqViWgACgkQeoGDM2ZGjQWbAgCfQGiw+LTmPWCuT/BN9W4qPfU5
F9cAn2a7vqbMXsH8QGhH11mHN03rYZBC
=BQYi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Installed:
asclock_2.0.12-2.dsc
to pool/main/a/asclock/asclock_2.0.12-2.dsc
asclock_2.0.12-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/asclock/asclock_2.0.12-2.diff.gz
asclock-themes_2.0.12-2_all.deb
to pool/main/a/asclock/asclock-themes_2.0.12-2_all.deb
asclock_2.0.12-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/asclock/asclock_2.0.12-2_i386.deb
Reply to: