Installed gtk+ 1:1.0.6-5 (i386 source all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 16:32:34 -0800
Source: gtk+
Binary: libgtk-doc libgtk-dbg libgtk1 libgtk-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:1.0.6-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>
Changed-By: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>
Description:
libgtk-dbg - Debugging static libraries for the GIMP Toolkit
libgtk-dev - Header files and static libraries for the GIMP Toolkit
libgtk-doc - Documentation and example code for the GIMP Toolkit
libgtk1 - The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets for X
Changes:
gtk+ (1:1.0.6-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Update Standards-Version to 3.2.1.
* Add Build-Depends in control file.
* Fix bashisms in debian/rules.
* /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc everywhere, /usr/man -> /usr/share/man
* (Whoa.) Change Section: of libgtk-doc from 'docs' to 'doc'. Oops.
Files:
c4a93d3c61372a0acfbd31527ba279b0 648 libs optional gtk+_1.0.6-5.dsc
b770130be8e5dac41d5bfb2ad4c4f2e7 6818 libs optional gtk+_1.0.6-5.diff.gz
ab96b8d33df72383e53851545d2a9d7e 466354 doc optional libgtk-doc_1.0.6-5_all.deb
67fb1910e3a3f1948ce131e4a4c8fae7 507230 devel optional libgtk-dev_1.0.6-5_i386.deb
cb10e6b41c28d9b01b850a5412d2c982 352992 libs optional libgtk1_1.0.6-5_i386.deb
e6f2811f939517a6889fc7c299ccbc77 2710696 devel optional libgtk-dbg_1.0.6-5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6RV/Wi9zROFMUtoARAsQ3AJ9PQ+7OYZmqYFj7i/naxy5MRbBz5gCgmOFd
Zz1dMgyAUjW7coQSsrG9mlc=
=GCjK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Installed:
libgtk-doc_1.0.6-5_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gtk+/libgtk-doc_1.0.6-5_all.deb
libgtk-dev_1.0.6-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gtk+/libgtk-dev_1.0.6-5_i386.deb
libgtk-dbg_1.0.6-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gtk+/libgtk-dbg_1.0.6-5_i386.deb
gtk+_1.0.6-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gtk+/gtk+_1.0.6-5.diff.gz
gtk+_1.0.6-5.dsc
to pool/main/g/gtk+/gtk+_1.0.6-5.dsc
libgtk1_1.0.6-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gtk+/libgtk1_1.0.6-5_i386.deb
Reply to: