[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded uw-imap 2000debian-1 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 02:09:16 -0500
Source: uw-imap
Binary: mlock libc-client2000 libc-client2000-dev ipopd uw-imapd
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2000debian-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@kullervo.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Changed-By: Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org>
Description: 
 ipopd      - POP2 and POP3 servers from UW
 libc-client2000 - UW c-client library for mail protocols
 libc-client2000-dev - UW c-client library for mail protocols
 mlock      - Mailbox locking program from UW
 uw-imapd   - remote mail folder access server for Pine and others
Closes: 67864 69746 70608 70647 76228 76642
Changes: 
 uw-imap (2000debian-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New Upstream version.
   * Package name has changed.
   * corrupted mailbox problem fixed upstream.  (Closes: #70647, #70608)
   * Fixed inability to recognize charsets with long names (Closes: #67864)
   * Fixed inaccurate ipop[23]d man page. (Closes: #76642)
   * Does not have spurious dependency on ldso now (Closes: #76228)
   * maildir driver no longer complains if maildir begins with a dot.
     (Closes: #69746)
Files: 
 c4522e16680f2b940052b2965f6ebb0c 86600 mail standard uw-imapd_2000debian-1_m68k.deb
 946f69753bba6f6ddb580f82939b4140 22240 mail standard ipopd_2000debian-1_m68k.deb
 36a1dcbd4c91d3e5d86b64ab91b8c808 913170 devel standard libc-client2000-dev_2000debian-1_m68k.deb
 ba5b64a1da899127c3cd35a4e9fd63e4 426518 libs standard libc-client2000_2000debian-1_m68k.deb
 54b653d96b1e4928c129427f946d4979 11788 mail standard mlock_2000debian-1_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjowwl8ACgkQcS3JWD3Fdvc5gwCeJQ4nv1AeS4Y08F0JLirgGlr7
DAsAniCf6XH2ybKZiSlXgoBYjQHni88R
=xtj3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: