[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed t-gnus 6.14.5.06.20001105cvs-1 (all source)



Installed:
t-gnus_6.14.5.06.20001105cvs.orig.tar.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/news/t-gnus_6.14.5.06.20001105cvs.orig.tar.gz
  replacing t-gnus_6.14.5.05.20001023cvs.orig.tar.gz
t-gnus_6.14.5.06.20001105cvs-1.diff.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/news/t-gnus_6.14.5.06.20001105cvs-1.diff.gz
  replacing t-gnus_6.14.5.05.20001023cvs-1.diff.gz
t-gnus_6.14.5.06.20001105cvs-1.dsc
  to dists/woody/main/source/news/t-gnus_6.14.5.06.20001105cvs-1.dsc
  replacing t-gnus_6.14.5.05.20001023cvs-1.dsc
t-gnus_6.14.5.06.20001105cvs-1_all.deb
  to dists/woody/main/binary-all/news/t-gnus_6.14.5.06.20001105cvs-1.deb
  replacing t-gnus_6.14.5.05.20001023cvs-1.deb


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.6
Date: Mon,  6 Nov 2000 19:27:41 +0900
Source: t-gnus
Binary: t-gnus
Architecture: source all
Version: 6.14.5.06.20001105cvs-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Takuo KITAME <kitame@northeye.org>
Description: 
 t-gnus     - A branch of Semi-gnus (Gnus for SEMI) variants.
Closes: 75566
Changes: 
 t-gnus (6.14.5.06.20001105cvs-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * debian/control: Recommends: metamail (closes: Bug#75566)
     NOTE: metamail is must needed only on XEmacs 21.1.x
   * debian/emacsen-install: closes Bug#75564: t-gnus: Fails to install
Files: 
 3d900c4c5b844cee413c7d078c60abc5 615 news optional t-gnus_6.14.5.06.20001105cvs-1.dsc
 84022bd2765f9fa0b09d92808c6e6f8e 1499806 news optional t-gnus_6.14.5.06.20001105cvs.orig.tar.gz
 e3c861b8e3996f594e206c4ffd1907bc 11084 news optional t-gnus_6.14.5.06.20001105cvs-1.diff.gz
 4c4ac98f868389de2dd335a517c4574f 2096132 news optional t-gnus_6.14.5.06.20001105cvs-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6BoriU+WZW1FVMwoRAtAdAJ4mDanXR0lsPY64/EAh07s39w6WWwCeN/Gf
Xezxq5zqEWiqq9EEQSLhTBU=
=LYSA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: