Installed procmail 3.15-1 (source i386)
Installed:
procmail_3.15.orig.tar.gz
to dists/woody/main/source/mail/procmail_3.15.orig.tar.gz
replacing procmail_3.15.orig.tar.gz
procmail_3.15-1.diff.gz
to dists/woody/main/source/mail/procmail_3.15-1.diff.gz
replacing procmail_3.15-0.2.pre.diff.gz
procmail_3.15-1.dsc
to dists/woody/main/source/mail/procmail_3.15-1.dsc
replacing procmail_3.15-0.2.pre.dsc
procmail_3.15-1_i386.deb
to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/mail/procmail_3.15-1.deb
replacing procmail_3.15-0.2.pre.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.6
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:51:05 +0200
Source: procmail
Binary: procmail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Description:
procmail - Versatile e-mail processor.
Changes:
procmail (3.15-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release. Maildir support is now built-in.
* Really change default PATH to "$HOME/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin".
* Modified the note in QuickStart about refiltering an old mail folder.
* Use SEARCHLIBS="" in debian/rules clean target to speed it up.
* Modified ft_dotlock in src/foldinfo.h to be in compliance with
locking policy, following a hint by the author.
* Removed (versioned) dependency on debianutils, since mailstat
does not use temporary files anymore.
* Made the .forward example in procmail(1) not to depend on the build
environment by modifying src/autoconf so that buggy_SENDMAIL is
never defined.
Files:
30b46162edd41c8897bce1be81772d11 570 mail standard procmail_3.15-1.dsc
2567273648f41ae23c51cf876e0019fc 200318 mail standard procmail_3.15.orig.tar.gz
32ae4b0ace3c4aad909f7e3ae8bc311d 8406 mail standard procmail_3.15-1.diff.gz
53288726e80d3ba5d965d38a0593d25b 130086 mail standard procmail_3.15-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5qkTfd9Uuvj7yPNYRAqJhAKCCAasdYXAtHSSxznKXZpsdC4PE5wCg0MGu
xqQ0TQ6RIwPfPLEy9XTA8Ks=
=hnVa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: