[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded gimp1.1 1.1.24-1 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.6
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:15:10 -0700
Source: gimp1.1
Binary: gimp1.1-perl gimp1.1 gimp1.1-nonfree libgimp1.1.24 libgimp1.1.24-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.1.24-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@kullervo.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Description: 
 gimp1.1    - Developers' release of the GNU Image Manipulation Program
 gimp1.1-nonfree - GIF and TIFF support for the GNU Image Manipulation Program
 gimp1.1-perl - Perl support and plugins for The GIMP
 libgimp1.1.24 - Developers' release of libraries necessary to run the GIMP
 libgimp1.1.24-dev - Developers' release of files for compiling plugins for The GIMP
Closes: 52634 62896 64294
Changes: 
 gimp1.1 (1.1.24-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version. (Sorry for slacking off there.) Closes: #64294
   * Add Build-Depends line. Closes: #62896
   * (Hopefully) add Help support in by installing the new libgtkxmhtml-dev
     package. Yes, this indirectly requires GNOME libraries -- but only
     to build. libgtkxmhtml1 does not require GNOME libraries at run-time,
     so I'm satisfied. Closes: #52634
Files: 
 03446103f6201dc7d30fd8b7656761c2 28748 non-free/graphics optional gimp1.1-nonfree_1.1.24-1_m68k.deb
 f60a36808ea560aacf8f07a82aca6e13 177246 graphics optional gimp1.1-perl_1.1.24-1_m68k.deb
 af7e8af80f81743ffbeb91d6eb86082e 6278598 graphics optional gimp1.1_1.1.24-1_m68k.deb
 2f5167292c90f538ec83271c63e6468b 169008 devel optional libgimp1.1.24-dev_1.1.24-1_m68k.deb
 8b75fe3a9517a47f57dca6b869519bbb 134402 libs optional libgimp1.1.24_1.1.24-1_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjmmOqYACgkQcS3JWD3FdvdEZACaAvR+jQODyrROsIuYN8K27Jlq
4SEAnRWih8Ivwi1kv2jIKj8/FjP1xb+p
=IXTQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: