[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded wmbiff 0.2-4 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.6
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 04:16:03 +0200
Source: wmbiff
Binary: wmbiff
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@kullervo.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Description: 
 wmbiff     - A dockable app that displays information about mailboxes
Closes: 63048
Changes: 
 wmbiff (0.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * wmbiff/wmbiff.c:
     + add an ifdef to get rid of that stupid, annoying
       debug message that bloated all our .xsession-errors files. This should
       have been fixed about 6 months ago, how lazy.
     + apply patch from Jorge Garcia <Jorge.Garcia@uv.es>: if a mailbox has
       > 1000 messages and after a rescan less than 1000 remain, the first
       character in the number display should be removed (closes: #63048).
       The patch also fixes a possible segfault when too many files are open.
   * debian/control:
     + changed maintainer email address.
     + added Build-Depends.
   * debian/wmbiffrc.5: months late, wmbiffrc finally has its manpage.
   * debian/wmbiff.1: small modifications to reflect the new wmbiffrc.5.
   * debian/rules:
     + install wmbiffrc.5.
     + revert changes to wmbiff/Makefile, all the modifications are handled
       here now.
   * In advance to Overfiend's rage and destruction against /usr/X11R6, I'm
     installing the binary and manpages in /usr, and removing the "1x" suffix
     to the manpage. Conforms with new Policy 3.2.0.0.
   * Upload the tar.gz as well, the old one was broken.
Files: 
 6c794f002b825d2148b787b522377065 19100 x11 optional wmbiff_0.2-4_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjmXs2gACgkQcS3JWD3FdvfYggCcC2WpZi6J/aB067/DQpdb6+fL
d9QAn3YjepXMmGgwtKza/ox9fPxxP9D2
=Gu5w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: