Installed efuns 0.17.0.3-2 (source i386)
Installed:
efuns_0.17.0.3-2.diff.gz
to dists/woody/main/source/editors/efuns_0.17.0.3-2.diff.gz
replacing efuns_0.17.0.3-1.diff.gz
gwml_0.17.0.3-2_i386.deb
to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/x11/gwml_0.17.0.3-2.deb
replacing gwml_0.17.0.3-1.deb
libxlib-ocaml_0.17.0.3-2_i386.deb
to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/libs/libxlib-ocaml_0.17.0.3-2.deb
replacing libxlib-ocaml_0.17.0.3-1.deb
efuns_0.17.0.3-2.dsc
to dists/woody/main/source/editors/efuns_0.17.0.3-2.dsc
replacing efuns_0.17.0.3-1.dsc
efuns_0.17.0.3-2_i386.deb
to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/editors/efuns_0.17.0.3-2.deb
replacing efuns_0.17.0.3-1.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.6
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:45:12 -0700
Source: efuns
Binary: gwml libxlib-ocaml efuns
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.17.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Brent A. Fulgham <bfulgham@debian.org>
Description:
efuns - Emacs Clone (In OCAML)
gwml - OCaml-Enabled Window Manager
libxlib-ocaml - X11 Toolkit for OCaml
Closes: 67061
Changes:
efuns (0.17.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* First cut at a Debian menu integration
* Slightly better initial configuration
* Better handling of install paths -- I had trouble with efuns/gwml not
being able to locate modules when installed in places like "/usr/lib/
ocaml/efuns/3.00-017+3".
* Corrected build dependency. Closes:Bug#67061
Files:
5f9c726081dd9508d58dfdb1c781bc4f 620 editors optional efuns_0.17.0.3-2.dsc
6fb5758b126dd445568c4692bf4b7145 16028 editors optional efuns_0.17.0.3-2.diff.gz
40b27cdc6eab1145193a6ee450cb5109 1779838 editors optional efuns_0.17.0.3-2_i386.deb
93300c2d153c2117fb1967b2e94b097c 2834936 devel optional libxlib-ocaml_0.17.0.3-2_i386.deb
cad6399fd5a1bcf8bf05374f87b0025c 2671056 x11 optional gwml_0.17.0.3-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5ckW/M6z0/jx+184RAhpkAJ953/G2WuMKZrgKiKNAKyez/8jakgCgmi3M
hBEoCsVO6Y0+bYF+140W1bc=
=dsNJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: