[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed gnome-pim 1.0.55-3 (source i386)



Installed:
gnome-pim_1.0.55-3_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/utils/gnome-pim_1.0.55-3.deb
  replacing gnome-pim_1.0.55-2.deb
gnome-pim_1.0.55-3_i386.deb
  to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/utils/gnome-pim_1.0.55-3.deb
  replacing gnome-pim_1.0.55-2.deb
gnome-pim_1.0.55-3.diff.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/utils/gnome-pim_1.0.55-3.diff.gz
  replacing gnome-pim_1.0.55-2.diff.gz
gnome-pim_1.0.55-3.diff.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/utils/gnome-pim_1.0.55-3.diff.gz
  replacing gnome-pim_1.0.55-2.diff.gz
gnome-pim_1.0.55-3.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/utils/gnome-pim_1.0.55-3.dsc
  replacing gnome-pim_1.0.55-2.dsc
gnome-pim_1.0.55-3.dsc
  to dists/woody/main/source/utils/gnome-pim_1.0.55-3.dsc
  replacing gnome-pim_1.0.55-2.dsc


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.6
Date: Fri,  9 Jun 2000 23:37:36 -0400
Source: gnome-pim
Binary: gnome-pim
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.55-3
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>
Description: 
 gnome-pim  - Calendar and address book for GNOME.
Closes: 65119
Changes: 
 gnome-pim (1.0.55-3) frozen unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Apply patch from Peter Samuelson to fix compile on ARM and Sparc
     (Closes: #65119) (important bug)
   * Take changes from latest upstream and apply to libversit.  Libversit
     was not allowing gnomecard to load it's save file making the program
     completely unusable.
Files: 
 7a6f7f031364c62bfb7f0bcaf3ed88ab 588 utils optional gnome-pim_1.0.55-3.dsc
 cb01e8a0faa6731d9bed5f5126de1980 10092 utils optional gnome-pim_1.0.55-3.diff.gz
 9f3a7dfb657ff82b7b3f1f2875340fa3 400862 utils optional gnome-pim_1.0.55-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjlBujgACgkQAE97gVR4K5qYTwCdH7/b1qsrMGzAcyGUrbpPHcC4
T2QAn1Y0IC1BsZxilrlXIOsElZKaSsM+
=1tH4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: