[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed kernel-patch-kdb 1.2-1 (source i386)



Installed:
kernel-patch-kdb_1.2-1.dsc
  to dists/woody/main/source/devel/kernel-patch-kdb_1.2-1.dsc
  replacing kernel-patch-kdb_0.6-2.dsc
kernel-patch-kdb_1.2-1_i386.deb
  to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/devel/kernel-patch-kdb_1.2-1.deb
kernel-patch-kdb_1.2-1.tar.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/devel/kernel-patch-kdb_1.2-1.tar.gz
  replacing kernel-patch-kdb_0.6.orig.tar.gz


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 22:06:14 +0200
Source: kernel-patch-kdb
Binary: kernel-patch-kdb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>
Description: 
 kernel-patch-kdb - Builtin kernel debugger.
Changes: 
 kernel-patch-kdb (1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Use included experimental dh_installkpatches script (patch apply
     script tries in a robust way to apply the best patch file).
   * Dropped kernel version from binary package name.
   * Do not force kdb into the kernel - realized that option --config in
     make-kpkg lets the user select it.
   * Suggest virtual package kernel-source instead of specific kernel
     package.
   * Updated README.Debian.
   * Fixed location of GPL file in copyright file (last time was a quite
     broken attempt indeed - hopefully noone noticed :}).
   * No useless build-stamp any more.
Files: 
 68d0dea007e86014d8ed7066be9c96d2 586 devel extra kernel-patch-kdb_1.2-1.dsc
 0e4194d157c178a5a923746c035616b7 196401 devel extra kernel-patch-kdb_1.2-1.tar.gz
 d561c2fd209c0fc4fc67a896209f912d 204460 devel extra kernel-patch-kdb_1.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iQB1AwUBOUfl+WWBdJ4Do/f1AQFPOAMAjnhMGDztFhGE0bz9b7C0IzybERVAS8Dx
Ltvzs7x7HHcK9o30wSABb+Ta5n8dXvUoRhjemE8pHodetYX9gvL9mM2F8VoWI1zL
PuvOYJlqjc8FaXq1eTVaAM/VVG1Yqu8l
=Yzmb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: