[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed procps 1:2.0.6-7 (source i386)



Installed:
libproc-dev_2.0.6-7_i386.deb
  to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/devel/libproc-dev_2.0.6-7.deb
  replacing libproc-dev_2.0.6-6.deb
procps_2.0.6-7_i386.deb
  to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/base/procps_2.0.6-7.deb
  replacing procps_2.0.6-6.deb
procps_2.0.6-7.diff.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/base/procps_2.0.6-7.diff.gz
  replacing procps_2.0.6-6.diff.gz
procps_2.0.6-7.dsc
  to dists/woody/main/source/base/procps_2.0.6-7.dsc
  replacing procps_2.0.6-6.dsc


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.6
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 13:31:54 +1000
Source: procps
Binary: libproc-dev procps
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.0.6-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Small <csmall@debian.org>
Description: 
 libproc-dev - library for accessing process information from /proc
 procps     - The /proc file system utilities.
Closes: 46213 55177 59112 59406 60913 62207 62484 62877 63495 63512 63762
Changes: 
 procps (1:2.0.6-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed missing version Closes: #62207, #62484, #59112
   * Stop crashes with umounted /proc Closes: #63512, #55177
   * Nicer man pages Closes: #63495, #59406
   * Fixed sysctl eof bug Closes: #62877
   * watch wraps properly Closes: #60913
   * watch handles tabs Closes: #46213
   * watch honors locale settings Closes: #63762
   * now versioned replaces line for bsdutils
Files: 
 a2057aa174f50eed53c137fde46c5235 591 base required procps_2.0.6-7.dsc
 14fc27dfa39d3a5541feb6b76cae3552 37518 base required procps_2.0.6-7.diff.gz
 26ca044d61ef2e59b5fb4baafc1e2560 136738 base required procps_2.0.6-7_i386.deb
 106dc0066607f70c070f413cac36144a 43494 devel optional libproc-dev_2.0.6-7_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE5MfRFx2zlrBLK36URAgQLAJ4/jtJ2nLTiT520b+Z7QG/eH8wDaACgm+C/
SuJeBDudpkhYHwCjOs9WEhU=
=ooED
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: