[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded blacs-mpi 1.1-10 (alpha) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.6
Date: Sat,  6 May 2000 07:35:28 +0200
Source: blacs-mpi
Binary: blacs1-lam blacs-mpich-dev blacs-test-common blacs-lam-dev blacs-mpich-test blacs-lam-test blacs1-mpich
Architecture: alpha
Version: 1.1-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: AlphaBuildd/John Goerzen <buildd@erwin.complete.org>
Description: 
 blacs-lam-dev - Basic Linear Algebra Communications Subprograms
 blacs-lam-test - Basic Linear Algebra Communications Subprograms
 blacs-mpich-dev - Basic Linear Algebra Communications Subprograms
 blacs-mpich-test - Basic Linear Algebra Communications Subprograms
 blacs1-lam - Basic Linear Algebra Communications Subprograms
 blacs1-mpich - Basic Linear Algebra Communications Subprograms
Closes: 62862 63466 63467 63468 63469 63470
Changes: 
 blacs-mpi (1.1-10) frozen unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Changed recommendation of blacs-lam-test from scalapack1-lam-test
     to scalapack-lam-test. Closes: #62862
   * Removed all recommendations and suggestions since I have problems
     with scalapack. Closes: #63466, #63467, #63468, #63469, #63470
Files: 
 ec54d64b734236e9a2f17620ad0f9c81 59456 devel extra blacs1-lam_1.1-10_alpha.deb
 4c90f38c990b9b268e3100ae21ddfc83 76096 devel extra blacs-lam-dev_1.1-10_alpha.deb
 551c530d7764b4f6e853a3a7dcdbf012 1074540 devel extra blacs-lam-test_1.1-10_alpha.deb
 f9361bd22a05afe2b01117d811ff29e7 58846 devel extra blacs1-mpich_1.1-10_alpha.deb
 512b160879f43cc28e3ef14202220769 76090 devel extra blacs-mpich-dev_1.1-10_alpha.deb
 2d591ef26fe217608957b6cf50109184 1074568 devel extra blacs-mpich-test_1.1-10_alpha.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iD8DBQE5LTHy3PeFtIodmh8RAm4AAKCYWlpBXlvIs/3LoB6tJQ+orleXwQCgq+fZ
C3cBM8IEU+f5KepOfPewuEk=
=QuXs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: