Uploaded gnome-guile 1.0.1.cvs.19991112-2 (m68k) to erlangen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.6
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 08:45:01 -0500
Source: gnome-guile
Binary: libguilegtk-dev gnome-guile libguilegtk0
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.0.1.cvs.19991112-2
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@kullervo.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Description:
gnome-guile - Guile-Gtk scheme interpreter (part of Gnome)
libguilegtk-dev - Dev libraries for Guile-Gtk scheme interpreter (part of Gnome)
libguilegtk0 - Libraries for Guile-Gtk scheme interpreter (part of Gnome)
Closes: 58433 60654 60657
Changes:
gnome-guile (1.0.1.cvs.19991112-2) frozen unstable; urgency=low
.
* Recompile to get libesd0|libesd0-alsa dependancies correct (Closes:
#60657, #60654) (both of these are important hence the request for
inclusion in frozen)
* Remove defs for gdk_color_copy and gdk_color_free from guile-gtk.h
because they are now defined in gdk/gdk.h with slightly different defs
(const defs). (Fixes compile error.)
* Remove links from libguilegtk0 and libguilegtk-dev docs to gnome-guile
docs and just install them separately (fixes compile/clean error)
* Fix compile errors in gnorba-glue.c. (Closes: #58433) (important
bug. compile error an alpha machines)
* Run dh_installchangelogs in appropriate places (lintian errors)
* Fix copyright file pointer to GPL (lintian errors)
* Stop mkdir'ing /usr/doc in two packages (lintian errors)
Files:
e49dc03afeeaeefd240db7c06789314f 194704 devel optional libguilegtk0_1.0.1.cvs.19991112-2_m68k.deb
ba1213d4687ac577610011cb9ed07263 170232 devel optional libguilegtk-dev_1.0.1.cvs.19991112-2_m68k.deb
da283fa0f9d650c0f33cfa8214e12155 45408 devel optional gnome-guile_1.0.1.cvs.19991112-2_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (SunOS)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iEYEARECAAYFAjjfJjcACgkQcS3JWD3FdvcItwCfRpHMLyVcBke/GTVeiorAVMAX
yPEAn0AKokwh6tZ2JyGvdV3TbgXiKFHc
=RwG3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: