[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded newt 0.50-5.4 (source sparc) to erlangen



Hello,

  this upload should go to potato(frozen) because it only fixes bug #58059 with
a trivial patch that hopefully don't break anything else.

Regards.

PS: I got acknowledgment from Enrique Zanardi (the maintainer of newt) to doing
    this NMU if that matters.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 22:11:16 +0100
Source: newt
Binary: libnewt0 python-newt newt-tcl libnewt-dev whiptail
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 0.50-5.4
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eric Delaunay <delaunay@lix.polytechnique.fr>
Description: 
 libnewt-dev - Developer's toolkit for newt windowing library
 libnewt0   - Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit - text mode windowing with slang
 newt-tcl   - A newt module for Tcl.
 python-newt - A newt module for Python.
 whiptail   - Displays user-friendly dialog boxes from shell scripts.
Closes: 58059
Changes: 
 newt (0.50-5.4) frozen unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload
   * Fixes bad cursor position in listboxes, Closes: Bug#58059
Files: 
 d25c2f6aba227e03fe900db527734926 663 devel Optional newt_0.50-5.4.dsc
 34f4d77cd1a06d0fdfabbb9920c7dc57 18414 devel Optional newt_0.50-5.4.diff.gz
 7abb982671619062c606e234eee70dab 58078 devel Optional libnewt-dev_0.50-5.4_sparc.deb
 4a5285f18260c289cf4d111b83781d0d 30728 base Required libnewt0_0.50-5.4_sparc.deb
 c0479e815e29a8fccf295299145ee2ed 17472 base Required whiptail_0.50-5.4_sparc.deb
 abc6596883d654900766ed631b01a574 13574 devel Optional newt-tcl_0.50-5.4_sparc.deb
 97f447614a71b8cfad58b75a570db17d 19294 devel Optional python-newt_0.50-5.4_sparc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOMlny43wRg1tC8FBAQGYDAP/Rs9C3KNE7IVZ76dNyNHZc4KERVKNnPBf
br3K5L3MIsN0YHVw8mXnfFaPgOKCsHisBbJC5S4iOddcn381PBGp8Jsbj0sP/EWr
lE1ShMh3dEKnexyfcZBzrb5ZqmHgJi86PiB6DY5g/Zz+3DRVc3x+F3r8JsogNPrA
xUVi8vRgCXY=
=lpE9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: