Installed procps 1:2.0.6-6 (source i386)
Installed:
procps_2.0.6-6.diff.gz
to dists/woody/main/source/base/procps_2.0.6-6.diff.gz
replacing procps_2.0.6-5.diff.gz
procps_2.0.6-6.dsc
to dists/woody/main/source/base/procps_2.0.6-6.dsc
replacing procps_2.0.6-5.dsc
libproc-dev_2.0.6-6_i386.deb
to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/devel/libproc-dev_2.0.6-6.deb
replacing libproc-dev_2.0.6-5.deb
procps_2.0.6-6_i386.deb
to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/base/procps_2.0.6-6.deb
replacing procps_2.0.6-5.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.6
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:31:37 +1100
Source: procps
Binary: libproc-dev procps
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.0.6-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Small <csmall@debian.org>
Description:
libproc-dev - library for accessing process information from /proc
procps - The /proc file system utilities.
Closes: 37023 46743 49130 52257 53736 55137 55852 55952 56701 56889 57134 58172 58365 58644
Changes:
procps (1:2.0.6-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New patchlevel (000221)
* ps 'f' ASCII art forest fixed. Closes: #57134, #58644
* let insane people run ps setuid. Closes: #56701
* note that kernel 2.3 is now faster. Closes: #49130
* top with WCHAN was leaking memory. Closes: #58172, #52257, #56889
* can show current CPU. Closes: #37023
* w looks better now. Closes: #55952
* init.d/procps removed if exists. Closes: #55137, #55852
* Fixed skill/snice man page (thanks man-db maint!) Closes: #53736, #46743
* Fixed ps man page Closes: #58365
Files:
bef8fc8f838258ae73471bd4b1d23b6c 568 base required procps_2.0.6-6.dsc
e192562785cff2228a31b91c7c7d54a8 32454 base required procps_2.0.6-6.diff.gz
91f46aba2783c6c01a7ef3e724ff890a 136792 base required procps_2.0.6-6_i386.deb
beccc04f32ddcba487f6443de3234339 43252 devel optional libproc-dev_2.0.6-6_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE4tKrgx2zlrBLK36URAtAiAKCRKXOAVo3mOSQFgsoEZubVlVchoQCgm2gO
XS85Yl1QxGWXxEk8CyTH5G4=
=PEQu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: