[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed cpio 2.4.2-32 (source i386)



Installed:
cpio_2.4.2-32.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/utils/cpio_2.4.2-32.dsc
  replacing cpio_2.4.2-30.dsc
cpio_2.4.2-32.dsc
  to dists/woody/main/source/utils/cpio_2.4.2-32.dsc
  replacing cpio_2.4.2-30.dsc
cpio_2.4.2-32_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/utils/cpio_2.4.2-32.deb
  replacing cpio_2.4.2-30.deb
cpio_2.4.2-32_i386.deb
  to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/utils/cpio_2.4.2-32.deb
  replacing cpio_2.4.2-30.deb
cpio_2.4.2-32.diff.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/utils/cpio_2.4.2-32.diff.gz
  replacing cpio_2.4.2-30.diff.gz
cpio_2.4.2-32.diff.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/utils/cpio_2.4.2-32.diff.gz
  replacing cpio_2.4.2-30.diff.gz


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 12:43:01 -0500
Source: cpio
Binary: cpio
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4.2-32
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Brian Mays <brian@debian.org>
Description: 
 cpio       - GNU cpio -- a program to manage archives of files.
Closes: 53056 58323
Changes: 
 cpio (2.4.2-32) frozen unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added patch by Fred Long <flong@sea.com> and Marc SCHAEFER
     <schaefer@alphanet.ch> to fix file corruption when a file changes
     during the backup.  (Closes: Bug#53056)
   * Added patch from Anders Hammarquist <iko@dd.chalmers.se> to make
     rmt work with Solaris ufsdump/ufsrestore.  (Closes: Bug#58323)
Files: 
 88833b377c611a17d113196f79c26a1b 630 utils important cpio_2.4.2-32.dsc
 602d4687b0e4a29d869a510383308558 20628 utils important cpio_2.4.2-32.diff.gz
 7a83d25daba07db9cc6e22c9b7cb59ed 66598 utils important cpio_2.4.2-32_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOKwzuPrhbOLeJ39FAQEW0QP+MqGlTJHpuwjdDMFzpAL1jcBVoBpoh6Gy
arYdNxJVgw7FCCw3pxAtKyf9IH9rL4CZxtYx3aqnsi0QU/N7il/1lBkqAOrfHGgl
y0yMf5fr0oXCRCcGq0W1Wu4sWp1IuxlnlUfqhT4Y851OcsHENsxDS5ClPN18sJHm
tSSdDy7z4Fg=
=suP2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: