[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed metamail 2.7-34 (source i386)



Installed:
metamail_2.7-34.diff.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/mail/metamail_2.7-34.diff.gz
  replacing metamail_2.7-33.diff.gz
metamail_2.7-34.diff.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/mail/metamail_2.7-34.diff.gz
  replacing metamail_2.7-33.diff.gz
metamail_2.7-34.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/mail/metamail_2.7-34.dsc
  replacing metamail_2.7-33.dsc
metamail_2.7-34.dsc
  to dists/woody/main/source/mail/metamail_2.7-34.dsc
  replacing metamail_2.7-33.dsc
metamail_2.7-34_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/mail/metamail_2.7-34.deb
  replacing metamail_2.7-33.deb
metamail_2.7-34_i386.deb
  to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/mail/metamail_2.7-34.deb
  replacing metamail_2.7-33.deb


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.6
Date: Tue,  8 Feb 2000 21:15:19 +0100
Source: metamail
Binary: metamail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.7-34
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin <jrodin@jagor.srce.hr>
Description: 
 metamail   - An implementation of MIME.
Closes: 47097 55260
Changes: 
 metamail (2.7-34) frozen unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * The install-all target tried to strip shell scripts, plus several
     additional flaws, which prevented building, closes: #55260.
   * Updated for newer mime-support, closes: #47097. Downgraded
     mime-support dependency to a recommendation, and removed useless
     version (as the new scheme is used, and 2.02-1 is too old for it).
   * Updated for Policy 3.1.1.
Files: 
 5db794d233e27e687cbe8374cbe9de11 568 mail optional metamail_2.7-34.dsc
 bf50add92f54f95c95883a8c7f54c615 36051 mail optional metamail_2.7-34.diff.gz
 c4a545e1f23143a28669f6934de42175 147692 mail optional metamail_2.7-34_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE4oezQC1RHoiANFZYRAo06AKCQwDHSZUgSaNbBZZYcm69YPn0i7QCgpq8L
3F2wkEKnJZEG6AI79/VFhRM=
=J+z6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: