[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed gnus 5.8.3-4 (all source)



Installed:
gnus_5.8.3-4.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/news/gnus_5.8.3-4.dsc
  replacing gnus_5.8.3-3.dsc
gnus_5.8.3-4.dsc
  to dists/woody/main/source/news/gnus_5.8.3-4.dsc
  replacing gnus_5.8.3-3.dsc
gnus_5.8.3-4_all.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-all/news/gnus_5.8.3-4.deb
  replacing gnus_5.8.3-3.deb
gnus_5.8.3-4_all.deb
  to dists/woody/main/binary-all/news/gnus_5.8.3-4.deb
  replacing gnus_5.8.3-3.deb
gnus_5.8.3-4.diff.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/news/gnus_5.8.3-4.diff.gz
  replacing gnus_5.8.3-3.diff.gz
gnus_5.8.3-4.diff.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/news/gnus_5.8.3-4.diff.gz
  replacing gnus_5.8.3-3.diff.gz


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Mon,  7 Feb 2000 00:52:21 -0600
Source: gnus
Binary: gnus
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.8.3-4
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Description: 
 gnus       - A versatile News and mailing list reader for Emacsen
Closes: 57068
Changes: 
 gnus (5.8.3-4) frozen unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * made message.el require gnus-msg, as an interim fix until upstream
     decides on how best to handle this. The problem is now that if you
     wish to use message as your mail composing tool, sending mail fils
     since message.el uses gnus-setup-posting-charset, and did not require
     gnus-msg. closes: Bug#57068
   * Use --backup instead of --version-control; does away with a warning
     message,
Files: 
 8485ef6752f0017fba31f786ea76bda5 542 experimental optional gnus_5.8.3-4.dsc
 b1e12c345cf7adca52a306750e5396c2 11606 experimental optional gnus_5.8.3-4.diff.gz
 20f68205ccda61bd5d9ca63a1e692a63 1286812 experimental optional gnus_5.8.3-4_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE4nm1nIbrau78kQkwRARMCAJ0V8NZy2lqrgn23FdO1HgsWq+p8tgCgjA1x
q0yB35D11qn+oEHu/WKUbHQ=
=D/0y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: