Uploaded asclock 2.0.11-4 (alpha) to master
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.6
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 17:01:48 +0100
Source: asclock
Binary: asclock
Architecture: alpha
Version: 2.0.11-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: AlphaBuildd/John Goerzen <buildd@complete.org>
Description:
asclock - A clock designed with the NeXTStep look
Closes: 40772 40801 41955 52008
Changes:
asclock (2.0.11-4) frozen unstable; urgency=low
.
* asclock.c: #if'ed code that prevents asclock from receiving
ButtonPress events when docked. Tested in `normal' mode and nothing
broke. The #if'ed code does not make sense, it seems something else
was going to be added but wasn't. Along with the modifications in -3,
this closes #41955 (sorry for taking soooo long Joey) (Closes:
bug#41955)
* debian/asclock.menu: added hints="Clocks" (Joost rules!) (Closes:
bug#52008)
* debian/rules: export DH_COMPAT=2
* debian/control: Standards-Version: 3.1.1
* FHS.
* debian/asclock.prerm: new file; removes /usr/doc link
* debian/control: added Replaces: gnome-panel-data. I am NOT happy with
this. A proper solution would be to split asclock into asclock and
asclock-themes so all the asclock packages (yes, there are THREE
packages providing some form of asclock -- four if the afterstep
package still contains it) can depend on it (yes, it's absolutely
ridiculous). I'm not doing that for the freeze. If someone wants to
go ahead and do that for _potato_, you've got my blessing to NMU such
a version. (Closes: bug#40801, bug#40772)
Files:
d3493367d8254093b6fe43d19d748c4e 101034 x11 optional asclock_2.0.11-4_alpha.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQEVAwUBOJNHcNYJEdzpssC9AQHpgwf/YM65QGgrUZeEKvmXfjwG/s6NRYBYdJXB
0GphoQws+lKpIMlYKX2UsQpP4ljDBDYEDI3mi3jEST5OdASU8fYEVp3h6mgzvfxA
XeHz5qyiZhqZQgDNrgfoNy7UDAAyGz+ZaITcBgBnG5HyHrM+Qm6/O1xZlIdgm0WK
GZzbZjfe6efovg53AiM2AEPx7FhCs3t99y7UmZQ6IDNlFGv/DemYHQ2kbwA6D56P
6O5qEpjZ+dZQgDyjAtiaLpQKdPMsXqo1P2uiu9Rm4Q9p2ght934nv5cRM7ylKHJc
oM99DRESKQVJzuiBMJ73zRqvUSW/AbybVJnj01Ou9TpucbRkOBKhjQ==
=k0Hf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: