Installed autoconf 2.13-17 (all source)
Installed:
autoconf_2.13-17_all.deb
to dists/potato/main/binary-all/devel/autoconf_2.13-17.deb
replacing autoconf_2.13-16.deb
gnu-standards_2.13-17_all.deb
to dists/potato/main/binary-all/devel/gnu-standards_2.13-17.deb
replacing gnu-standards_2.13-16.deb
autoconf_2.13-17.diff.gz
to dists/potato/main/source/devel/autoconf_2.13-17.diff.gz
replacing autoconf_2.13-16.diff.gz
autoconf_2.13-17.dsc
to dists/potato/main/source/devel/autoconf_2.13-17.dsc
replacing autoconf_2.13-16.dsc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.6
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 00:16:53 -0500
Source: autoconf
Binary: autoconf gnu-standards
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.13-17
Distribution: unstable
Maintainer: Ben Pfaff <blp@gnu.org>
Description:
autoconf - automatic configure script builder
gnu-standards - GNU coding and package maintenance standards
Changes:
autoconf (2.13-17) unstable; closes=54740; urgency=medium
.
* I've added a small patch from "Nicolás" Lichtmaier
<nick@debian.org>. Much as I hate to do so, this effectively forks
Debian autoconf (in a small way) for potato. Hopefully this patch, or
equivalent, will be incorporated upstream before release of woody.
Files:
919777febf58f7eb4ef58cb637801145 859 devel optional autoconf_2.13-17.dsc
bb7d89b10261cd04ded02478b8bc5789 29430 devel optional autoconf_2.13-17.diff.gz
797f9afff4492e317acbd7590e2cb184 346318 devel optional autoconf_2.13-17_all.deb
9afa0c0549df36ccfa981aa633094cb0 111936 devel optional gnu-standards_2.13-17_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iQEVAwUBOH1ltrf2jhx5fmQdAQE8bAf6Aul30nlUEONcWNDpoKKuEeRsKJWNSXvJ
U+hoMN4MHfWFrrDMjDXA4n8yxqeaEwPowgLB7Q0EzRE1Skeye8hbpOjgtvL+03Am
oOaf+LYVVJbnFQs5JxFdLC2GhjsMBMeN/cJcEJXPfwtWp544trW2vTcA6Jeb9w3S
MJ8D8sRryQ/iNWECrew/90w2B0CaslzDoS0JdBOxwSDaAu1nmv+n+MDDWbq5duVR
1XMEthlEbGIR5H38zE2QL0wuSF7JCU6uFQovGMwZuVXE8CzylM0K4Xbx0/tsNj6D
k4loOxzyLKY4txvhLSp1mggo/5pzWYNyIfP4Pw/aPsivC+e2tVpaEw==
=Abjg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: