Installed util-linux 2.10d-4 (source i386)
Installed:
util-linux_2.10d-4.dsc
to dists/potato/main/source/base/util-linux_2.10d-4.dsc
replacing util-linux_2.10d-3.dsc
bsdutils_2.10d-4_i386.deb
to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/bsdutils_2.10d-4.deb
replacing bsdutils_2.10d-3.deb
mount_2.10d-4_i386.deb
to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/mount_2.10d-4.deb
replacing mount_2.10d-3.deb
util-linux_2.10d-4_i386.deb
to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/util-linux_2.10d-4.deb
replacing util-linux_2.10d-3.deb
util-linux_2.10d-4.diff.gz
to dists/potato/main/source/base/util-linux_2.10d-4.diff.gz
replacing util-linux_2.10d-3.diff.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.6
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 17:24:46 +0100
Source: util-linux
Binary: bsdutils mount util-linux
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.10d-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Vincent Renardias <vincent@debian.org>
Description:
bsdutils - Basic utilities from 4.4BSD-Lite.
mount - Tools for mounting and manipulating filesystems.
util-linux - Miscellaneous system utilities.
Closes: 15110 53254
Changes:
util-linux (2.10d-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* ipcrm now accepts multiple ids thanks to a patch from Topi Miettinen.
closes: #15110: ipcrm doesn't work with xargs.
* fix postinst script:
closes: #53254: util-linux: ppc chunk of postinst script has syntactical error.
Files:
7a8293d1df8b42c8819cc9785a6802a4 657 base required util-linux_2.10d-4.dsc
942591fd0fbda0abca78bccaca76e941 26879 base required util-linux_2.10d-4.diff.gz
ab93f09a693e391b60183aec08d47349 500410 base required util-linux_2.10d-4_i386.deb
99e0a6f2af0a3f9340f349c89d9475bb 76606 base required mount_2.10d-4_i386.deb
5ae4c77c7189aae82404c16edaa2d9ec 29016 base required bsdutils_2.10d-4_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBOGD+Bg+bo1sI1mwpAQHcyAP/YlwG00PFX+qZLbPgSWrZhyOTq2ieexiZ
KrB2xcP0Re0QFQeZKIT07cEWkzYMrDzYgwjfibSNWKjYUfRcLzChrgp0S3Q5KXuE
OmKat8/SJtbd1iOxNHTxZ2RyWjA+BGF1ZZu0PZJ8BSmlRqBwsbNthCKgXAsI7DSP
4we91Pfia8A=
=o2fh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: