[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded xemacs21 21.1.7-8 (sparc) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 23:33:27 -0400
Source: xemacs21
Binary: xemacs21-support xemacs21-supportel xemacs21-nomule xemacs21-bin xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn xemacs21-htmldoc xemacs21-mule xemacs21
Architecture: sparc
Version: 21.1.7-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian SPARC Build Daemon <buildd@marcus.seva.net>
Description: 
 xemacs21-bin - Editor and kitchen sink -- support binaries
 xemacs21-mule - Editor and kitchen sink -- Mule binary
 xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn - Editor and kitchen sink -- Mule binary compiled with canna and wn
 xemacs21-nomule - Editor and kitchen sink -- Non-mule binary
Closes: 47770 47794
Changes: 
 xemacs21 (21.1.7-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added patch to fix japanese autodetection.  Closes: #47794.
   * Back to 21.1.7 unexelf.c with patch from xemacs-patches.
   * Add update-alternatives lines in -bin postinst to remove the old
     alternatives from 21.1-p2.
   * Adjust alternatives values for new packages so they overwrite any old
     values hanging around.  This and above are all I can do to fix
     47770. Closes: #47770.
   * Add postinst to xemacs21 to add the /usr/doc link (gets rid of lintian
     warning)
Files: 
 1960e66ed7c2d6f9ed074a69aa4d19eb 1535710 editors optional xemacs21-nomule_21.1.7-8_sparc.deb
 3162b477d83c82af602a7b29916b0d0b 1719572 editors optional xemacs21-mule_21.1.7-8_sparc.deb
 27886c8c457a5295e0756b12600bbe3e 1732226 editors optional xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn_21.1.7-8_sparc.deb
 840f5c25478a32a4e87b7c6a1ff79029 181658 editors optional xemacs21-bin_21.1.7-8_sparc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOBpNzCo9WkFm9rsJAQGJZQP6AmdQw1whEjyY8yX4XlMzH/3m9xTutR57
Q6mKRbB4cfmwB26eINt1TTceJQZXL59UdEmpjhKRVsPlmRHPIaL5CqhOrg09YxB+
bxBgne/APkU6keWSIt1+517hPDPqYvAFOCMTPc6HrVJKQ1juG8V4M/EuHKczUA27
3L41vywhuTE=
=+75/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: