[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed cvs-buildpackage 3.13 (all source)



Installed:
cvs-buildpackage_3.13.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/devel/cvs-buildpackage_3.13.dsc
  replacing cvs-buildpackage_3.12.dsc
cvs-buildpackage_3.13_all.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-all/devel/cvs-buildpackage_3.13.deb
  replacing cvs-buildpackage_3.12.deb
cvs-buildpackage_3.13.tar.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/devel/cvs-buildpackage_3.13.tar.gz
  replacing cvs-buildpackage_3.12.tar.gz


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Fri,  8 Oct 1999 06:56:37 -0500
Source: cvs-buildpackage
Binary: cvs-buildpackage
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Description: 
 cvs-buildpackage - Debian package scripts for CVS source trees.
Closes: 44041 44564 45327
Changes: 
 cvs-buildpackage (3.13) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Made cvs-inject (optionally) more permissive. I did not apply the
     patch in the big report directly, since the package being injected is
     in violation of policy; and I would rather let the human
     decide. Courtesy of Joey Hess closes: Bug#44041
   * Added blank space in directory name handling for cvs-inject, using the
     patrch in the report. Courtesy of Joey Hess  (this is really ugly,
     joey) closes: Bug#44564
   * Documented the fact that one has to update the working directory
     manually after cvs-upgrade is run. closes: Bug#45327
   * Moved to FHS compliance.
Files: 
 e8f293e334aac63b889d3ed008cbeadc 506 devel optional cvs-buildpackage_3.13.dsc
 528e5359ef45fe7c93939a84fb397c06 35984 devel optional cvs-buildpackage_3.13.tar.gz
 29ebf06e488c15711a6c8d9c7c1148d5 49384 devel optional cvs-buildpackage_3.13_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE3/d11Ibrau78kQkwRATowAKDbfJxMX5XEfSCYoDrUSu1Zt0pi7ACfaE3I
nksOJIxhQgQ5r/KWtgionb0=
=ihCa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: