[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed procps 1:2.0.6-2 (source i386)



Installed:
procps_2.0.6-2.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/base/procps_2.0.6-2.dsc
  replacing procps_2.0.6-1.dsc
libproc-dev_2.0.6-2_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/devel/libproc-dev_2.0.6-2.deb
  replacing libproc-dev_2.0.6-1.deb
procps_2.0.6-2_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/procps_2.0.6-2.deb
  replacing procps_2.0.6-1.deb
procps_2.0.6-2.diff.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/base/procps_2.0.6-2.diff.gz
  replacing procps_2.0.6-1.diff.gz


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.6
Date: Tue,  7 Dec 1999 14:42:51 +1100
Source: procps
Binary: libproc-dev procps
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.0.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Small <csmall@debian.org>
Description: 
 libproc-dev - library for accessing process information from /proc
 procps     - The /proc file system utilities.
Closes: 35137 45398 48308 50010 50055 51098
Changes: 
 procps (1:2.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Changed psmisc from reccomends to suggests
   * %MEM now works, Closes: #50010 #50055 #50148 #50356
   * top doesn't crash with > 204 processes Closes: #50055
   * Another libproc fd leak fixed Closes: #45398
   * ps silently ignores m and -m for future compatibility Closes: #48308
   * Added a sysctl.conf and other files as suggested Closes: #51098
   * Fix start field instability
   * ps.1 fixed Closes: #35137
Files: 
 734cbe5d0863f1c7e6f8c912419d3029 568 base required procps_2.0.6-2.dsc
 5c323f3d7b0f21fddd63fc67ad46981e 24969 base required procps_2.0.6-2.diff.gz
 a89cad89af7edcc9df7eb72503b253de 125580 base required procps_2.0.6-2_i386.deb
 c7efa91ef9dc6befdc1f0debe460be2f 31596 devel optional libproc-dev_2.0.6-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE4TIeEx2zlrBLK36URAkBgAJ45l9SvJRksLF/9gvs5WRaxzcJs5QCfYgLW
LgDocwXAkFOkrHVeNByOcjY=
=gmEd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: