Installed modutils 2.3.5-1 (source i386)
Installed:
modutils_2.3.5.orig.tar.gz
to dists/potato/main/source/base/modutils_2.3.5.orig.tar.gz
replacing modutils_2.1.121.orig.tar.gz
modutils_2.3.5-1.diff.gz
to dists/potato/main/source/base/modutils_2.3.5-1.diff.gz
replacing modutils_2.1.121-27.diff.gz
modutils_2.3.5-1.dsc
to dists/potato/main/source/base/modutils_2.3.5-1.dsc
replacing modutils_2.1.121-27.dsc
modutils_2.3.5-1_i386.deb
to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/modutils_2.3.5-1.deb
replacing modutils_2.1.121-27.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.6
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 03:50:39 +0200
Source: modutils
Binary: modutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>
Description:
modutils - Linux module utilities.
Closes: 46573
Changes:
modutils (2.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version
* Add alias for nvram for i386, Closes: Bug#46573
* Redid debian/rules, we build in debian/build now
* No longer install the GOODIES from kerneld, is't obsolete
* Update various scripts to note that conf.modules is now called
modules.conf
* Update maintainerscript to note that the format for the configurationfile
has changed.
* Made /etc/modutils/paths empty those defaults are compiled-in now
* Remove predefined aliases from /etc/modutils/aliases
* Add aliases for devfs
* kernelversion and the kdstat manpage have been merged upstream now, so
don't include it ourselves
Files:
9451768149bfc2b3b69ed6b3dc58d6d2 576 base required modutils_2.3.5-1.dsc
a89802652b5eeec9417996fbebed0447 174532 base required modutils_2.3.5.orig.tar.gz
34ae1a5bbd5db2aa1851b1c398f3d0ce 15644 base required modutils_2.3.5-1.diff.gz
24b3c5af3f3440e5c3c0c90738f9ecdd 159368 base required modutils_2.3.5-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjgFOGsACgkQPLiSUC+jvC0PYACdGS+BmWi7qYDpd2gP4M42vCAb
JVUAnjM3DMpyBDC8PEhYsa7EWdJhvQU0
=jhgv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: