[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded scwm 0.99.4-1 (alpha) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Fri,  8 Oct 1999 18:44:13 +0200
Source: scwm
Binary: scwm
Architecture: alpha
Version: 0.99.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: AlphaBuildd/John Goerzen <buildd@complete.org>
Description: 
 scwm       - Scheme Configurable Window Manager
Changes: 
 scwm (0.99.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * new upstrem release: 0.99.4
   * removed patch to configure.in to permit the building when scwm is
     not already installed, because it's upstream now
   * removed patch for configurable pixmap dir: it's upstream now
   * removed the themes patch: they're upstream now
   * fixed the numlock bug by upstream: this fix bug #36152 and #36153
     (they are merged)
   * scwm use wm-menu-config now
   * scwm did not restore the perms of the menu generator at install
     time; so removing and then reinstall scwm did not restore completely
     the package. Fixed.
   * some changes in the preparation phase of the build: call autoheader,
     call libtoolize with the option --automake
   * FHS compliant package (I hope)
   * activated multibyte support
   * added README-Gnome to the docs
   * activated sound support
   * changed the system.scwmrc to one based on the upstream system.scwmrc
     (much better of the old debian one)
Files: 
 74f57790ffdd3a07e26438bb293be06d 951000 x11 extra scwm_0.99.4-1_alpha.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQEVAwUBOATPjtYJEdzpssC9AQFfpQgAlhYkrRbKV7LDmVjtQq1oQ9kIlBQQlxtx
fXNtQvx1c9FLh+5I2/d1AbzuVcq3VvYFn1N9aYDBpZEgLVG435KHd0qZYyPrdn+3
7Ofsv/Wgm6SBaBKMRV+DZBgnHZTkrE2iyeej5Iq/TyxEAFQL50uRtmdvIj3/yKdw
KpZ814uMl4yGFus5vYKDoPrV/PeCaQ5cbHIhW/FT3+8z10bM3kjMndI86lY89vRJ
fPTE62FhOR0UdPHe5e3eHVStqfpi7Em3USevpBOpBV0zH3ZD/Sv5cQVJr1qxQMgI
3MHvGiczAFg5tLi22uTW8iVUdwaRg0cTeRZ63+zCjF5WfYidvDhjWw==
=koBd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: