Installed psgml 1.1.7-1 (all source)
Installed:
psgml_1.1.7.orig.tar.gz
to dists/potato/main/source/text/psgml_1.1.7.orig.tar.gz
replacing psgml_1.1.6.orig.tar.gz
psgml_1.1.7-1.diff.gz
to dists/potato/main/source/text/psgml_1.1.7-1.diff.gz
replacing psgml_1.1.6-6.diff.gz
psgml_1.1.7-1.dsc
to dists/potato/main/source/text/psgml_1.1.7-1.dsc
replacing psgml_1.1.6-6.dsc
psgml_1.1.7-1_all.deb
to dists/potato/main/binary-all/text/psgml_1.1.7-1.deb
replacing psgml_1.1.6-6.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.6
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 11:29:27 -0500
Source: psgml
Binary: psgml
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Description:
psgml - An Emacs major mode for editing SGML documents.
Closes: 39718 46854 47092
Changes:
psgml (1.1.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Correct the location of the iso8859.map file in psgml-init.el. closes:
Bug#46854
* New upstream version incorporates Debian fix for <foo/> "empty" xml
tag handling. closes: Bug#39718
* Found a fix for having psgml recognize system identifiers. It used to
work before, but the method irt used to wirk was the side effect of a
bug. When the bug was fixed, psgml lost the ability to work with
explicit system identifies. The correct fix was to correctly configure
the variables, sgml-system-path, and sgml-public-map. closes: Bug#47092
* Moved to FHS compliance. Now, when sgml-base moves, we shall have to
change, but apart from that, the FHS move is done.
Files:
f610c1b81d5392fcbd0498dbc75af52f 545 text optional psgml_1.1.7-1.dsc
9ad5f1514b9168c8936214e930a1c6e2 242433 text optional psgml_1.1.7.orig.tar.gz
bb6abf9f565c364b3143ec0976bbfb39 47626 text optional psgml_1.1.7-1.diff.gz
97793574fc06847776d44924b59c2e06 280892 text optional psgml_1.1.7-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE4AhETIbrau78kQkwRAW3cAKDZ89NDI5Nxdlo25LOwZJ+uKu3w7ACguIOR
CGe1Cgsu5eDmQXMd83R+goc=
=Sp72
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: