[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded xinetd 2.2.1-8.SD1.1 (alpha) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 20:27:55 +0200
Source: xinetd
Binary: xinetd
Architecture: alpha
Version: 2.2.1-8.SD1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: AlphaBuildd/John Goerzen <buildd@complete.org>
Description: 
 xinetd     - replacement for inetd with many enhancements
Changes: 
 xinetd (2.2.1-8.SD1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload (is Norber Veber MIA?).
   * Updated for the new netbase/inetd stuff.
     Fixes: #43161 #44537 #44529 #31500
   * Depend on an appropriate netbase version because of the switch to
     diverting /etc/init.d/inetd, and not diverting /usr/sbin/update-inetd.
   * Un-diverting is done in a sane way, I think. Postinst checks whether the
     exact diversion still exists, and preserves the obsolete scripts, with
     suffix ".xinetd.old", and then removes the diversion. The obsolete files
     made this way are "rm -f"ed in postrm.
   * Updated for Policy 3.x. Converted to debhelper for full Policy
     compliance. Fixes: #44099
   * Added rm -f /etc/xinetd.conf under purging in postrm, fixes: #36809
   * Included Solar Designer <solar@false.com>'s SD1 patch from:
     ftp://ftp.dataforce.net/pub/solar/xinetd-2.2.1-SD1.diff , fixes: #35166
   * Reworked most of the maintainer scripts.
   * The checkportmap() function, from the inetd's init script ought to
     be changed to check in /etc/xinetd.conf file.
   * Beautified debian/README* files, fixed some oddities in "SEE ALSO"
     sections of the man pages.
   * If this release doesn't break anything, I'll probably upload the newest
     upstream version, from the alive branch.
Files: 
 4f325e237148f02d5aaf8cf2d7c77d0a 115514 net optional xinetd_2.2.1-8.SD1.1_alpha.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQEVAwUBN+Yrl9YJEdzpssC9AQHyAQf/QdOxHZ/gXqUMXfvmJnB8/WcsSf3VcWrU
YDbEpIQ+bFidBzDl6ifIEhlnGCl0ot6DWv19r18+i9uld3fvCJLM+NbMnWRIkLtt
/7ZPAp2OpqIpl3uaGx5BAKhXEOhHkS/9uzlQS7hPT9zdv9seSPl2kevMHgoNgTo2
BBeujk+zHSsab2JWP4nXHyd+bevbhykhp7IJkxyDvLyCjmtuh50FTTjK67+3y1s0
yt/qYb14gBuk4zkc1qYCPrsXOK/G8wcMAEYWUaEueR8UI4+pro1Z9zQEHIxWRu0c
ZIR9Zq2LQUpZ010I3ZOE1H8C+94Wx20A+thlYKS0ag3CC14Cf1OaNg==
=2GEs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: