[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed procps 1:2.0.3-1 (source i386)



Installed:
procps_2.0.3.orig.tar.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/base/procps_2.0.3.orig.tar.gz
  replacing procps_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz
procps_2.0.3-1.diff.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/base/procps_2.0.3-1.diff.gz
  replacing procps_2.0.2-4.diff.gz
procps_2.0.3-1.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/base/procps_2.0.3-1.dsc
  replacing procps_2.0.2-4.dsc
libproc-dev_2.0.3-1_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/devel/libproc-dev_2.0.3-1.deb
  replacing libproc-dev_2.0.2-4.deb
procps_2.0.3-1_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/procps_2.0.3-1.deb
  replacing procps_2.0.2-4.deb


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 16:59:16 +1000
Source: procps
Binary: libproc-dev procps
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Small <csmall@debian.org>
Description: 
 libproc-dev - library for accessing process information from /proc
 procps     - The /proc file system utilities.
Closes: 29970 44832 44836
Changes: 
 procps (1:2.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream source
   * Debian personality does m flag Closes: #44832
   * Corrected typo in top.1 Closes: #44836
   * New improved watch Closes: #29970
Files: 
 8d728b35cd4fa2324520af69cb039001 630 base required procps_2.0.3-1.dsc
 ebcd7749cf194d7925380c3281398741 192945 base required procps_2.0.3.orig.tar.gz
 f84574f122830dabeca48ca246694019 8584 base required procps_2.0.3-1.diff.gz
 342059950a929bb0a60635771e35b853 108364 base required procps_2.0.3-1_i386.deb
 fe8d6d3d46f037d43f5e0f81eac6da19 30464 devel optional libproc-dev_2.0.3-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBN93KvktPWVTnxNRpAQGiQQP/VIXCIDszxOlX89pKxckbBd5Y+Jw+KBo+
BmUZ53SP+L7lJapNaEMzXXXSqgJSo6Hj69YCjxcEa/lIiA9J9UyjijHRIk90enV+
N8O/jqU+gtarnrehOBvUatawNJ2WeEWOYKg22+tXIPc7YzGAcBD3Vy0a3oIr+z8p
CrtY3ugVAZM=
=osDF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: