[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.07-2 (source i386)



Installed:
libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-2.diff.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/interpreters/libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-2.diff.gz
  replacing libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-1.diff.gz
libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-2.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/interpreters/libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-2.dsc
  replacing libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-1.dsc
libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-2_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/interpreters/libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-2.deb
  replacing libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-1.deb


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 00:59:45 -0700
Source: libterm-readline-gnu-perl
Binary: libterm-readline-gnu-perl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.07-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Darren Stalder <torin@daft.com>
Description: 
 libterm-readline-gnu-perl - Perl module to use GNU Readline library
Closes: 42882
Changes: 
 libterm-readline-gnu-perl (1.07-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * make test opens /dev/tty.  The autobuilders run from cron and
     therefore don't have a /dev/tty.  Therefore the package fails to build
     under the autobuilders.
     Using the idea from Roman Hodek <Roman.Hodek@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>,
     make test only runs if /dev/tty is available.  Closes Bug#42882.
Files: 
 949fcd6fc401269c6c404c21d2d3e96b 684 interpreters optional libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-2.dsc
 61a4d3682de274fa7368bdd32916ed34 2487 interpreters optional libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-2.diff.gz
 9fdb9249a2d57b25d757090e9e773894 67418 interpreters optional libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBN7PS/I4wrq++1Ls5AQFUVwP/X2LS2sC1DHDriAQCR1uXBBs/5atJTf0Z
9DP4yveoACr1E4rsO0wyz5QepnRJ9BrVRK0M21+vlb/EuuehgjUCrDEJrblgS4jS
UH514Q9VHnpYBqn+wh4QKsoUd4ZLOag/+ss2YkAKVgmm5Fm4/stBFQERlOXZZR8L
0AlTQ+9FtE8=
=xTzG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: